Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement thermo_water_update scheme (non-portable wrapper to cam_thermo_water_update) #178

Merged

Conversation

jimmielin
Copy link
Member

@jimmielin jimmielin commented Dec 12, 2024

Originator(s): @jimmielin

Summary (include the keyword ['closes', 'fixes', 'resolves'] and issue number):

Closes #177, implementing thermo_water_update scheme to call cam_thermo_water_update.

Describe any changes made to the namelist: N/A

List all files eliminated and why: N/A

List all files added and what they do:

Implement thermo_water_update scheme
A schemes/thermo_water_update/thermo_water_update.F90
A schemes/thermo_water_update/thermo_water_update.meta

List all existing files that have been modified, and describe the changes:
(Helpful git command: git diff --name-status development...<your_branch_name>)

Include thermo_water_update scheme in CAM7 suite and simple physics suites
M suites/suite_cam7.xml
M suites/suite_kessler.xml
M suites/suite_tj2016.xml

List any test failures:

Is this a science-changing update? New physics package, algorithm change, tuning changes, etc? Yes

@jimmielin jimmielin added the enhancement New feature or request label Dec 12, 2024
@jimmielin jimmielin self-assigned this Dec 12, 2024
@jimmielin jimmielin marked this pull request as draft December 12, 2024 23:17
@jimmielin
Copy link
Member Author

jimmielin commented Dec 12, 2024

Marking as draft until ESCOMP/CAM-SIMA#316 is merged and CAM7 test failure is resolved (ESCOMP/CAM-SIMA#335) so this "scheme" can be fully tested.

@jimmielin jimmielin requested a review from nusbaume January 9, 2025 20:37
Copy link
Collaborator

@nusbaume nusbaume left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good @jimmielin! just had one (optional) comment change request.

@nusbaume nusbaume requested a review from cacraigucar January 23, 2025 18:10
@jimmielin jimmielin merged commit 0c54513 into ESCOMP:development Feb 14, 2025
3 checks passed
jimmielin added a commit to ESCOMP/CAM-SIMA that referenced this pull request Feb 14, 2025
…agnostic output (#339)

Tag name (required for release branches): sima0_03_000
Originator(s): @jimmielin 

Description (include the issue title, and the keyword ['closes',
'fixes', 'resolves'] followed by the issue number):

Closes ESCOMP/atmospheric_physics#161,
ESCOMP/atmospheric_physics#166,
ESCOMP/atmospheric_physics#176:
- Fixes Add check_energy related history output variables to
check_energy_diagnostics
ESCOMP/atmospheric_physics#161
- Fixes Need to remove old CAM suite definition files
[#166](ESCOMP/atmospheric_physics#166) as well
(but other PRs might get to it first) since I'm modifying the SDF files
in this PR anyway
- Fixes Update standard name for teout
[#176](ESCOMP/atmospheric_physics#176)
(updates teout standard name to
vertically_integrated_total_energy_using_dycore_energy_formula_at_end_of_physics_timestep)

Companion PRs:
- ESCOMP/atmospheric_physics#178
- ESCOMP/atmospheric_physics#169

Describe any changes made to build system: N/A

Describe any changes made to the namelist: N/A

List any changes to the defaults for the input datasets (e.g. boundary
datasets): N/A

List all files eliminated and why: N/A

List all files added and what they do: N/A

List all existing files that have been modified, and describe the
changes:
(Helpful git command: `git diff --name-status
development...<your_branch_name>`)

```
Updates teout standard name to vertically_integrated_total_energy_using_dycore_energy_formula_at_end_of_physics_timestep
M       src/data/registry.xml
M       src/dynamics/mpas/dyn_comp.F90
M       src/dynamics/none/dyn_grid.F90
M       src/dynamics/se/dyn_comp.F90

Updates atmospheric_physics submodule.
M       .gitmodules
M       src/physics/ncar_ccpp

Notes that CAM7 test is preexisting failure.
M       test/existing-test-failures.txt
```

If there are new failures (compared to the
`test/existing-test-failures.txt` file),
have them OK'd by the gatekeeper, note them here, and add them to the
file.
If there are baseline differences, include the test and the reason for
the
diff. What is the nature of the change? Roundoff?

```
derecho/intel/aux_sima:
  SMS_Ln9.mpasa480_mpasa480.FKESSLER.derecho_intel.cam-outfrq_kessler_mpas_derecho (Overall: DIFF) details:
  SMS_Ln9.ne5pg3_ne5pg3_mg37.FKESSLER.derecho_intel.cam-outfrq_se_cslam (Overall: DIFF) details:
  SMS_Ln9.ne5pg3_ne5pg3_mg37.FTJ16.derecho_intel.cam-outfrq_se_cslam (Overall: DIFF) details:
    - baseline differences due to new thermo_water_update scheme in Kessler and TJ2016.

  
  SMS_Ln9.ne5pg3_ne5pg3_mg37.FCAM7.derecho_intel.cam-outfrq_se_cslam_analy_ic (Overall: FAIL) details:
    - pre-existing failure in CAM7 tests
```

```
derecho/gnu/aux_sima:
  SMS_Ln2.ne3pg3_ne3pg3_mg37.FPHYStest.derecho_gnu.cam-outfrq_kessler_derecho (Overall: NLFAIL) details:
    FAIL SMS_Ln2.ne3pg3_ne3pg3_mg37.FPHYStest.derecho_gnu.cam-outfrq_kessler_derecho NLCOMP
    - suite_kessler.xml changed to suite_kessler_test.xml, NLCOMP failure for physics_suite.
      the actual run passes BFB

  SMS_Ln9.mpasa480_mpasa480.FKESSLER.derecho_gnu.cam-outfrq_kessler_mpas_derecho (Overall: DIFF) details:
  SMS_Ln9.ne5pg3_ne5pg3_mg37.FKESSLER.derecho_gnu.cam-outfrq_se_cslam (Overall: DIFF) details:
  SMS_Ln9.ne5pg3_ne5pg3_mg37.FTJ16.derecho_gnu.cam-outfrq_se_cslam (Overall: DIFF) details:
    - baseline differences due to new thermo_water_update scheme in Kessler and TJ2016.

  SMS_Ln9.ne5pg3_ne5pg3_mg37.FCAM7.derecho_gnu.cam-outfrq_se_cslam_analy_ic (Overall: FAIL) details:
    - pre-existing failure in CAM7 tests
```

If this changes climate describe any run(s) done to evaluate the new
climate in enough detail that it(they) could be reproduced:

CAM-SIMA date used for the baseline comparison tests if different than
latest:
mattldawson pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 20, 2025
…rmo_water_update) (#178)

Originator(s): @jimmielin

Summary (include the keyword ['closes', 'fixes', 'resolves'] and issue
number):

Closes #177, implementing thermo_water_update scheme to call
cam_thermo_water_update.

Describe any changes made to the namelist: N/A

List all files eliminated and why: N/A

List all files added and what they do:

Implement thermo_water_update scheme
A       schemes/thermo_water_update/thermo_water_update.F90
A       schemes/thermo_water_update/thermo_water_update.meta

List all existing files that have been modified, and describe the
changes:
(Helpful git command: `git diff --name-status
development...<your_branch_name>`)

Include thermo_water_update scheme in CAM7 suite and simple physics
suites
M       suites/suite_cam7.xml
M       suites/suite_kessler.xml
M       suites/suite_tj2016.xml

List any test failures:

Is this a science-changing update? New physics package, algorithm
change, tuning changes, etc? Yes

---------

Co-authored-by: Jesse Nusbaumer <[email protected]>
mwaxmonsky added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 21, 2025
Tag name (The PR title should also include the tag name):
atmos_phys0_09_000
Originator(s): @mwaxmonsky 

List all `development` PR numbers included in this PR and the title of
each:
* Add diagnostic output for ALL constituents #199 by @peverwhee
* Build MUSICA in CAM-SIMA #198 by @boulderdaze
* Implement thermo_water_update scheme (non-portable wrapper to cam_thermo_water_update) #178 by @jimmielin and @nusbaume
* Implement diagnostics for global energy fixer, check_energy standard name update #169 by @jimmielin
* Add kessler_test Test SDF for FPHYStest to split off from FKESSLER test #204 by @jimmielin
* PBL utils transfer #193 by @mwaxmonsky and @nusbaume

List all automated tests that failed, as well as an explanation for why
they weren't fixed: N/A
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
Status: Tag
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants