Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: merge v0.2.0 into master #111

Merged
merged 89 commits into from
Feb 14, 2021
Merged

chore: merge v0.2.0 into master #111

merged 89 commits into from
Feb 14, 2021

Conversation

danielolsen
Copy link
Contributor

@danielolsen danielolsen commented Feb 12, 2021

Purpose

Update master, after which we will add a v0.2.0 tag.

Proposed release notes

Closed Issues:

Merged pull requests (features):

Merged pull requests (fixes etc.):

Time to review

15 minutes? I guess it depends how long it takes for us to decide what our release notes should look like.

danielolsen and others added 30 commits July 23, 2020 11:27
* refactor: change set_parameter to set_optimizer_attribute

* doc: update README to reflect new JuMP compatibility

* chore: update JuMP dependency to 0.21.3

* chore: update Manifest.toml to reflect JuMP v0.21.3
* refactor: use new DataFrames groupby syntax

* refactor: use innerjoin instead of join for DataFrame

* chore: update DataFrames compatibility from 0.20 to 0.21

* chore: update Manifest.toml for DataFrames 0.21.4
Add github action to check formatting
…threads_from_python

feat: select number of gurobi threads from python
feat, refactor: add new entry point to run call.py without PowerSimData
docs: update documentation for args used to run scripts
…data.py afterward

chore: remove extra print statements
@danielolsen danielolsen self-assigned this Feb 12, 2021
@kasparm
Copy link
Contributor

kasparm commented Feb 12, 2021

I think the release note is a bit too long.

Maybe for now just list the key features/fixes that were added in this release.

What we will aim for in the future is having a link to the detailed release note on a separate page.

@danielolsen
Copy link
Contributor Author

@kasparm ideally we will be doing this more than once per year, so future ones will be shorter. What do you think about separating the 'merged PRs' section into 'features' (anything the user will see) and 'fixes etc.' (bug fixes, CI stuff, documentation)?

@kasparm
Copy link
Contributor

kasparm commented Feb 12, 2021

@danielolsen that is fine with me for now. As said for the future we would like these reports on github short and and have a more detailed report on a separate page.

@danielolsen
Copy link
Contributor Author

@kasparm I edited the proposed note above.

@kasparm
Copy link
Contributor

kasparm commented Feb 13, 2021

Looks good. Don't forget to change the version number in Project.toml

@danielolsen
Copy link
Contributor Author

Looks good. Don't forget to change the version number in Project.toml

Done

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants