-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 22
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use Consistent Numbering scheme in Computation Steps #185
Comments
#139 seems like it would resolve this |
@Epigenetic please review the diff in #139. While it does not address your comment specifically, it does change all cross-references to use named identifiers, in both visible prose and as permalinks. If that resolves the root of your issue, please close as a duplicate. Otherwise, please comment and keep open. |
I think this is related to #139, but not resolved. This is more related to one of your comments (#139 (comment)) where you said: |
Editor’s draft now has the named steps merged, so I think we could probably do one of several things:
Thoughts? |
Messing around with the markup it seems like switching to OL gets us most of the way there. The only place this has issues is step 2B.ii which has substeps that nest deeper than the style sheet currently accounts for. |
If that ends up being problematic, it's easily solvable. |
The numbering schemes for the sub-steps of 4.3.2 are insistent from step to step. In step 2.B uses bullets then roman numerals and then letters, while steps 2.A, 2.C, and 2.D use bullets throughout. Step 2.F uses roman numerals and then bullets or letters. This makes the algorithm more difficult to parse than it needs to be, and given that all the steps should be executed in sequence, they should probably all be ordered lists.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: