Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

completions steps were disconnected from algo, and 'append' instruction was phrased as a 'join' #187

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 1, 2023

Conversation

cookiecrook
Copy link
Contributor

@cookiecrook cookiecrook commented Feb 7, 2023

closes #142


Preview | Diff

@@ -363,7 +363,7 @@ <h4>Computation steps</h4>
<ol>
<li id="comp_labelledby_set_current" name="step2B.ii.a">Set the <code>current node</code> to the node referenced by the IDREF.</li>
<li id="comp_labelledby_recursion" name="step2B.ii.b"><em>LabelledBy Recursion:</em> Compute the text alternative of the <code>current node</code> beginning with the overall <a href="#comp_computation">Computation</a> step. Set the <code>result</code> to that text alternative.</li>
<li id="comp_labelledby_append" name="step2B.ii.c">Append the <code>result</code>, with a space, to the <code>accumulated text</code>.</li>
<li id="comp_labelledby_append" name="step2B.ii.c">Append a space character and the <code>result</code> to the <code>accumulated text</code>.</li>
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Justification for including this change: while adding id="comp_append" below, I noticed these "append" steps were actually phrased as "joins" ("append the result with a space" is += "result " not += " result") so I rephrased for accuracy. If the editors prefer, I can include this separately.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it's fine to leave in here, it's essentially equivalent to "fixing a typo" IMO

@@ -464,11 +464,11 @@ <h4>Computation steps</h4>
<p>Tooltip attributes are used only if nothing else, including subtree content, has provided results. </p>
</details></div>
</li>
<li id="comp_append">Append a space character and the <code>result</code> of each step above to the <code>total accumulated text</code>.</li>
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

same here…

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Still editorial IMO.

@cookiecrook cookiecrook requested a review from MelSumner February 7, 2023 22:06
@spectranaut spectranaut requested a review from jnurthen February 9, 2023 18:15
cookiecrook added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 11, 2023
resolves #185

pls merge #187 first, as this one branched from it
Copy link
Contributor

@MelSumner MelSumner left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 :shipit:

@@ -363,7 +363,7 @@ <h4>Computation steps</h4>
<ol>
<li id="comp_labelledby_set_current" name="step2B.ii.a">Set the <code>current node</code> to the node referenced by the IDREF.</li>
<li id="comp_labelledby_recursion" name="step2B.ii.b"><em>LabelledBy Recursion:</em> Compute the text alternative of the <code>current node</code> beginning with the overall <a href="#comp_computation">Computation</a> step. Set the <code>result</code> to that text alternative.</li>
<li id="comp_labelledby_append" name="step2B.ii.c">Append the <code>result</code>, with a space, to the <code>accumulated text</code>.</li>
<li id="comp_labelledby_append" name="step2B.ii.c">Append a space character and the <code>result</code> to the <code>accumulated text</code>.</li>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it's fine to leave in here, it's essentially equivalent to "fixing a typo" IMO

@cookiecrook
Copy link
Contributor Author

@jnurthen @spectranaut merge?

@MelSumner MelSumner merged commit 0c3a573 into main Mar 1, 2023
github-actions bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 1, 2023
…on was phrased as a 'join' (#187)

SHA: 0c3a573
Reason: push, by MelSumner

Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

AccName "completion" step is disconnected from the computation list
3 participants