-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 54
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
rosie: restore rosie ws #2355
rosie: restore rosie ws #2355
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What is there looks ok. Is it sufficient?
Travis CI build failing due to lack of |
571336e
to
dcbf8c0
Compare
By adding the Rosie dependencies we are now activating tests which might not have been run since Python2. Rosie tests are falling over in a peculiar way. It would appear |
In #2288
|
3716468
to
f42815d
Compare
ff8b35a
to
e918e71
Compare
3e63550
to
a2309eb
Compare
The tests should pass this time:
|
I had a look-see at this, & it is failing for quite a significant reason: the Because all other was just testing for a re-direct to the equivalent with the trailing slash, so it passed. But it redirected from a Presumably at some point the web files required were removed from |
e59f9ed
to
fc625ba
Compare
Thanks Sadie, hopefully this should now pass. |
Travis CI unit test failing - need to filter out |
Ah, & naturally those web files come a bundle of issues as flagged also by Codacy. Can we get them ignored & (re-)raised as an Issue? I can't recall quite how we dealt with those previously... |
On Codacy. We should filter out the external libraries from the analysis. Some of our own stuffs can be fixed. The others should be flagged for ignore. |
1525a2a
to
d558044
Compare
Branch in conflict. |
d558044
to
f798de9
Compare
@oliver-sanders what is the state of this PR, so I know when to review? Is the plan to address those Codacy points? Also I have kicked Travis CI but across a number of tries it keeps returning an error from a syntax error in |
f798de9
to
e56be5a
Compare
PR was still ready for review, tests broken by most recent conflict resolution. |
Unit test broken by style check? |
e56be5a
to
f3798ed
Compare
The three codacy issues can be ignored:
|
@wxtim Please perform a final sanity check. The Codacy/Bandit issue can be unflagged in your branch? |
NOTE: As
sqlalchemy
was installed to system Python rather than Travis Python some tests wern't being run (due to missing dependencies). These have been fixed..travis/now
with a newRI_PATH
for settingPATH
inrose_site_init
inenv -i
environments.