-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: Concise titles for the top nav #18856
Merged
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
b5094b5
Concise titles for the top nav
benjackwhite 5a80d5c
Update UI snapshots for `chromium` (1)
github-actions[bot] 5cf91ba
Changes
benjackwhite ad90a81
Fix
benjackwhite cdcf5a9
Merge branch 'master' into feat/concise-nav
benjackwhite a7f5086
Merge branch 'master' into feat/concise-nav
benjackwhite 86fbd87
Update UI snapshots for `webkit` (2)
github-actions[bot] 0d73672
Update UI snapshots for `chromium` (1)
github-actions[bot] 66c231a
Update UI snapshots for `chromium` (2)
github-actions[bot] a75fe26
Update UI snapshots for `chromium` (1)
github-actions[bot] File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think the other changes are great, we can't go with this though. There's no data under "Data" here – that lives in "Events" and "People". "Data management" is just about the shape of data. Hence I propose we rename it to the industry-standard "Taxonomy" (though we've got a lot of work left in that regard), and move it below both "People". Or just move while keeping "Data management".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I like "Taxonomy".
If we were worried about too much change at once, we keep "Data management" for a while and move it as you suggest, then change it to Taxonomy at a later date, maybe alongside some improvements.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's not just taxonomy though 🤔
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Moving away from "Data" would avoid confusion with "Data warehouse" down the line, too.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Tried something different (see screenshot)...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What's the pragmatic approach here? I think data sufficiently gets the point across, even if there is technically data in other places.