-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
TP results plotting looks different for TP during DAQ and TP during ITI #336
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
@timjarsky The reason for the bunches are that we set the timestamps before iterating over all TPs for TP during DAQ, see MIES/Packages/MIES/MIES_Oscilloscope.ipf Line 540 in 66c8a96
Now setting it in the loop will not make things much better as that will not differ much from the current value. The code is pretty fast already. And we should actually not use the time of pushing the TP data to evaluation but the time of acquisition. But getting the DAQ starting time of a single TP chunk is not something we already have. Let's chat about that tomorrow. |
TP during DAQ start times are grouped because the analysis time is used, not the acquisition time. Switch to using acquisition time. Calculate acquisition time from the high-precision start point of each sweep. |
Reminder for Tim - calculating the chunk acquisition time is simple math. It's already written for TP storage, so this will have a minor impact on speed. |
Idea how to get times precisely:
|
|
The plotting of the TP resistance values in the oscilloscope window get combined into a single time point.
zoomed view:

The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: