Skip to content

Process all available TP with ITC hardware #102

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
MichaelHuth opened this issue Dec 6, 2018 · 5 comments
Closed

Process all available TP with ITC hardware #102

MichaelHuth opened this issue Dec 6, 2018 · 5 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working Testpulse

Comments

@MichaelHuth
Copy link
Collaborator

Currently for ITC hardware only the last available TP in the background task is further processed.

If the task is late it happens that in the sampled data more than one TP is available. This can be used to process all available (yet unprocessed) TPs.

@t-b t-b added the Testpulse label Dec 12, 2018
@t-b
Copy link
Collaborator

t-b commented Dec 18, 2018

Let's tackle that after #49.

@t-b
Copy link
Collaborator

t-b commented Dec 20, 2018

  • Store all testpulses when storing full testpulses
  • Evaluate all testpulses for TP MD, TP SD and TP while DAQ

@timjarsky
Copy link
Collaborator

Closing, no use case for this feature at this time. May reopen if automation with ACQ4 requires TP data from every TP.

@t-b
Copy link
Collaborator

t-b commented Apr 25, 2025

Michael is currently working on #336. And we found out again that in TP acquistion we only evaluate the last TP (for ITC, Sutter) but all for NI. We already do evaluate all TPs with "TP during DAQ".

May reopen if automation with ACQ4 requires TP data from every TP.

Should that now be fixed?

@t-b t-b added the bug Something isn't working label Apr 25, 2025
@t-b
Copy link
Collaborator

t-b commented Apr 25, 2025

@timjarsky See #102 (comment).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working Testpulse
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants