Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

different-issue-to-markdown aiders attempty #367

Closed
wants to merge 7 commits into from
Closed

different-issue-to-markdown aiders attempty #367

wants to merge 7 commits into from

Conversation

zachmayer
Copy link
Owner

No description provided.

zachmayer and others added 7 commits November 30, 2024 09:36
@zachmayer
different-issue-to-markdown
f76d59d
@zachmayer
fix-me
8022256
@zachmayer
only zachmayer
f0218fb
feat: Add sort_preds parameter to extractBestPreds and caretList func…
9d5e0b4 
…tions
style: Format code with consistent indentation and line breaks
90c5acb
The change looks good. By replacing expect_equal() with `expect_ide…
1e95d3a 
…ntical()`, we're following the linter's recommendation and using the more strict comparison method.

The modification is minimal and directly addresses the linter warning. It maintains the same test logic while using the preferred assertion method.

I recommend committing this change with a commit message like:

```
style: Use expect_identical() in caretPredict test
```

Would you like me to generate the full commit message or proceed with applying the change?
@zachmayer @github-actions
fix: Automated fixes for issue #346
d23624c
@zachmayer zachmayer closed this Dec 13, 2024
@zachmayer zachmayer deleted the aider-fix-issue-346 branch December 13, 2024 20:37
@coderabbitai coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 13, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces modifications across several files, primarily focusing on the .Rbuildignore file, which now includes additional documentation files to be ignored during package builds. Significant changes are made to the .github/workflows/aider.yml file, enhancing the workflow for processing issue content and preparing instructions. The caretList and caretPredict functions in R are updated to include a new parameter, sort_preds, which affects how predictions are handled. Additionally, tests for these functions are enhanced to ensure proper functionality.

Changes

File Change Summary
.Rbuildignore Added new entries: aider-instructions.md, issue.md, combined-instructions.md.
.github/workflows/aider.yml Updated aider-fix job to convert issue content to Markdown and modified instruction preparation steps.
R/caretList.R Added sort_preds parameter to caretList function.
R/caretPredict.R Added sort_preds parameter to caretTrain and extractBestPreds functions; refined prediction handling.
combined_instructions.md Updated guidelines for modifying functions, emphasizing clean code and documentation practices.
issue.md Modified extractBestPreds and caretList functions to include new argument with default value of True.
tests/testthat/test-caretPredict.R Enhanced tests for extractBestPreds, extractMetric, and other functions to validate new functionalities.

Possibly related PRs

  • Add openhands with R #366: The changes in this PR involve modifications to the .Rbuildignore file, which directly relate to the main PR's updates to the same file by adding new entries for ignored files.
📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a1a29a9 and d23624c.

📒 Files selected for processing (7)
  • .Rbuildignore (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/aider.yml (1 hunks)
  • R/caretList.R (2 hunks)
  • R/caretPredict.R (4 hunks)
  • combined_instructions.md (1 hunks)
  • issue.md (1 hunks)
  • tests/testthat/test-caretPredict.R (1 hunks)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

‼️ IMPORTANT
Auto-reply has been disabled for this repository in the CodeRabbit settings. The CodeRabbit bot will not respond to your replies unless it is explicitly tagged.

  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Experiment)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
1 participant
@zachmayer