Add openhands with R #366
Add openhands with R #366
Conversation
|
Important Review skippedAuto incremental reviews are disabled on this repository. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request include updates to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
.github/workflows/openhands-resolver.yml (3)
24-24: Consider using a more flexible LLM model versioning strategy.The hardcoded model version
anthropic/claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022might become outdated. Consider using a more flexible versioning strategy or documenting the process for updating the model version.
60-74: Consider simplifying complex conditional logic.The job conditions are complex and could be refactored for better maintainability. Consider extracting the conditions into reusable expressions.
Example approach:
if: | ${{ github.event_name == 'workflow_call' || contains(fromJSON('["fix-me", "fix-me-experimental"]'), github.event.label.name) || ( contains(fromJSON('["issue_comment", "pull_request_review_comment", "pull_request_review"]'), github.event_name) && contains(github.event[endsWith(github.event_name, 'review') && 'review' || 'comment'].body, inputs.macro || '@openhands-agent') && contains(fromJSON('["OWNER", "COLLABORATOR", "MEMBER"]'), github.event[endsWith(github.event_name, 'review') && 'review' || 'comment'].author_association) ) }}
225-231: Consider adding timeout and retry mechanism.The OpenHands resolver execution could potentially hang or fail due to network issues. Consider adding a timeout and retry mechanism.
Example approach:
- Add a timeout to the Python command execution
- Implement a retry mechanism for transient failures
- Add proper logging for timeout and retry attempts
# Add timeout and retry logic MAX_RETRIES=3 TIMEOUT=300 # 5 minutes for attempt in $(seq 1 $MAX_RETRIES); do if timeout $TIMEOUT python -m openhands.resolver.resolve_issue \ --repo "${{ github.repository }}" \ --issue-number "${{ env.ISSUE_NUMBER }}" \ --issue-type "${{ env.ISSUE_TYPE }}" \ --max-iterations "${{ env.MAX_ITERATIONS }}" \ --comment-id "${{ env.COMMENT_ID }}"; then break fi echo "Attempt $attempt failed. Retrying..." sleep $((attempt * 5)) # Exponential backoff done
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
.Rbuildignore(1 hunks).github/workflows/openhands-resolver.yml(1 hunks).gitignore(1 hunks).openhands_instructions(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
- .gitignore
- .Rbuildignore
- .openhands_instructions
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
.github/workflows/openhands-resolver.yml
145-145: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:3:66: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
145-145: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:4:27: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
145-145: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:7:66: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
145-145: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:8:27: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
145-145: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:11:59: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
145-145: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:12:27: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
145-145: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:15:59: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
145-145: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:16:30: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
145-145: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:20:64: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
145-145: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:22:65: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
145-145: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2129:style:25:1: Consider using { cmd1; cmd2; } >> file instead of individual redirects
(shellcheck)
145-145: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:25:61: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
145-145: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:26:77: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
145-145: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:27:79: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
145-145: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:30:53: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
204-204: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2235:style:2:4: Use { ..; } instead of (..) to avoid subshell overhead
(shellcheck)
204-204: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2235:style:4:4: Use { ..; } instead of (..) to avoid subshell overhead
(shellcheck)
234-234: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:37: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
234-234: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:4:38: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
Try again with openhands