Add Debian 11 support by moving the policy packages definition #359
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
What about adding Debian 11 to metadata.json and update this PR to something like "Add support for Debian 11"? |
ekohl
changed the title
EmRowlands
pushed a commit
to EmRowlands/puppet-selinux
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 29, 2023
Move the policy packages to a generic location for newer Debian
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Pull Request (PR) description
Provide default package names for Debian based systems. Can still override for specific versions if need be.
This Pull Request (PR) fixes the following issues
One of my internal modules tests against Debian 11. I didn't guard the selinux bits and noticed the package names don't have a default set for Debian.