Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Lake fraction and depth in one regional domain #187

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 27, 2020

Conversation

ShanSunNOAA
Copy link
Contributor

This is to expand lake fraction and depth calculation to both global and regional domain (gtype=regional_gfdl). The resulting lake fraction and depth are added to oro data.

This refers to Issue #173

…on to both global and regional domain (gtype=regional_gfdl). The resulting lake fraction and depth are added to oro data.
@@ -83,14 +83,16 @@ elif [ $gtype = stretch ]; then
export target_lat=35.5 # Center latitude of the highest resolution tile
elif [ $gtype = nest ] || [ $gtype = regional_gfdl ]; then
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would set the default for add_lake to be false. And I would include a lake_cutoff variable. Please update the script prolog for these changes. The other four 'driver' scripts will need to be updated as well.

…on to both global and regional domain (gtype=regional_gfdl). The resulting lake fraction and depth are added to oro data.
…on to both global and regional domain (gtype=regional_gfdl). The resulting lake fraction and depth are added to oro data. add_lake is set to false by default.
@ShanSunNOAA
Copy link
Contributor Author

ShanSunNOAA commented Oct 26, 2020 via email

export res=96
export add_lake=false # Add lake frac and depth to orography data.
export lake_cutoff=0.20 # lake frac < lake_cutoff ignored when add_lake=T
export res=768
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I see you tested with a C768 regional grid. Will the lake code work with other resolutions?

@ShanSunNOAA
Copy link
Contributor Author

ShanSunNOAA commented Oct 26, 2020 via email

@GeorgeGayno-NOAA
Copy link
Collaborator

@YihuaWu-NOAA Are you satisfied these changes are working for the regional model?

@GeorgeGayno-NOAA
Copy link
Collaborator

@shansun6 & @YihuaWu-NOAA Should I merge now or wait until you have the ESG grid working?

@ShanSunNOAA
Copy link
Contributor Author

ShanSunNOAA commented Oct 27, 2020 via email

@GeorgeGayno-NOAA
Copy link
Collaborator

The branch at

I'd prefer to merge this commit, unless the ESG grid is ready to be tested right now, to reduce the amount of catching up next time around. Make sense? Thanks, Shan

On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 7:30 AM GeorgeGayno-NOAA @.***> wrote: @shansun6 https://github.com/shansun6 & @YihuaWu-NOAA https://github.com/YihuaWu-NOAA Should I merge now or wait until you have the ESG grid working? — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#187 (comment)>, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ALORMVXJ4J3WGBG5E5W63Q3SM3DPZANCNFSM4S62A6RA .

Ok. Will merge now.

@GeorgeGayno-NOAA
Copy link
Collaborator

The branch at aca0d79 was successfully compiled on Hera, Orion, Jet, WCOSS-Cray and WCOSS-Dell. The grid generation regression test was run on these machines and passed. Will merge.

@GeorgeGayno-NOAA GeorgeGayno-NOAA removed the request for review from YihuaWu-NOAA October 27, 2020 14:56
@ShanSunNOAA
Copy link
Contributor Author

ShanSunNOAA commented Oct 27, 2020 via email

Copy link
Collaborator

@GeorgeGayno-NOAA GeorgeGayno-NOAA left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good.

@GeorgeGayno-NOAA GeorgeGayno-NOAA merged commit 3b0d976 into ufs-community:develop Oct 27, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants