fix: use sgtpooki/file-type for resolving image type

[pengx17]

No description provided.

[graphite-app]

Your org has enabled the Graphite merge queue for merging into canary

Add the label “merge” to the PR and Graphite will automatically add it to the merge queue when it’s ready to merge. Or use the label “hotfix” to add to the merge queue as a hot fix.

You must have a Graphite account and log in to Graphite in order to use the merge queue. Sign up using this link.

[pengx17]

• fix: use sgtpooki/file-type for resolving image type #7326 👈
• canary

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

Join @pengx17 and the rest of your teammates on Graphite

[nx-cloud]

☁️ Nx Cloud Report

CI is running/has finished running commands for commit 7b181a6. As they complete they will appear below. Click to see the status, the terminal output, and the build insights.

📂 See all runs for this CI Pipeline Execution

---

✅ Successfully ran 6 targets

• nx test:coverage @affine/monorepo
• nx build @affine/server-native -- --target x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu --use-napi-cross
• nx build @affine/native -- --target x86_64-pc-windows-msvc --use-napi-cross
• nx build @affine/native -- --target aarch64-apple-darwin --use-napi-cross
• nx build @affine/native -- --target x86_64-apple-darwin --use-napi-cross
• nx build @affine/native -- --target x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu --use-napi-cross

---

Sent with 💌 from NxCloud.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 4 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 28.33%. Comparing base (81462fe) to head (7b181a6).
Report is 4 commits behind head on canary.

Files	Patch %	Lines
...src/modules/peek-view/view/image-preview/index.tsx	0.00%	4 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           canary    #7326       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   58.30%   28.33%   -29.98%     
===========================================
  Files         854      654      -200     
  Lines       37714    14938    -22776     
  Branches     4086     2626     -1460     
===========================================
- Hits        21990     4233    -17757     
+ Misses      15430    10461     -4969     
+ Partials      294      244       -50     

Flag	Coverage Δ
server-test	?
unittest	28.33% <0.00%> (+0.01%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[forehalo]

this library is ridiculous, can we really trust it?

[pengx17]

this library is ridiculous, can we really trust it?

There could be other image types like webp that we may also need to introduce soon. Besides blocksuite already has its as the dependency in https://github.com/toeverything/blocksuite/blob/45bdebd333aef568fd4c0e7bd5aebf9e6a8662f0/packages/blocks/src/attachment-block/utils.ts#L185.

[forehalo]

@pengx17 I dont know the reason but why don't we use file-type directly? browser support is included after I checked

[EYHN]

@pengx17 I dont know the reason but why don't we use file-type directly? browser support is included after I checked

More context:

toeverything/blocksuite#6803
sindresorhus/file-type#578

[forehalo]

I prefer easily patching file-type with yarn by our own

[EYHN]

I prefer easily patching file-type with yarn by our own

I also tried patch, but the reference to node:buffer comes from his upstream package token-types