Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ASoC: SOF: restore byte control data after resume #121

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 13, 2018

Conversation

ranj063
Copy link
Collaborator

@ranj063 ranj063 commented Sep 10, 2018

This patch adds support for retreiving byte control data after
the DSP comes out of D3.

Signed-off-by: Ranjani Sridharan [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Seppo Ingalsuo [email protected]

Copy link

@singalsu singalsu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The >80 chars long line should be fixed, this patch has worked well for me.

*/
ipc_cmd = SOF_IPC_COMP_SET_DATA;
ctrl_type = SOF_CTRL_TYPE_DATA_SET;
if (scontrol->control_data->data->magic == SOF_ABI_MAGIC)

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This line is apparently too long. The automatic checks complain about this, sorry.

This patch adds support for retreiving byte control data after
the DSP comes out of D3.

Signed-off-by: Ranjani Sridharan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Seppo Ingalsuo <[email protected]>
@ranj063
Copy link
Collaborator Author

ranj063 commented Sep 11, 2018

@singalsu fixed the checkpatch warning now.

Copy link

@singalsu singalsu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, looks good now!

@lgirdwood lgirdwood merged commit ae5f868 into thesofproject:topic/sof-dev Sep 13, 2018
@ranj063 ranj063 deleted the bytecontrol branch March 22, 2019 17:08
vijendarmukunda pushed a commit to vijendarmukunda/linux that referenced this pull request Feb 13, 2024
Like commit 1cf3bfc ("bpf: Support 64-bit pointers to kfuncs")
for s390x, add support for 64-bit pointers to kfuncs for LoongArch.
Since the infrastructure is already implemented in BPF core, the only
thing need to be done is to override bpf_jit_supports_far_kfunc_call().

Before this change, several test_verifier tests failed:

  # ./test_verifier | grep # | grep FAIL
  thesofproject#119/p calls: invalid kfunc call: ptr_to_mem to struct with non-scalar FAIL
  thesofproject#120/p calls: invalid kfunc call: ptr_to_mem to struct with nesting depth > 4 FAIL
  thesofproject#121/p calls: invalid kfunc call: ptr_to_mem to struct with FAM FAIL
  thesofproject#122/p calls: invalid kfunc call: reg->type != PTR_TO_CTX FAIL
  thesofproject#123/p calls: invalid kfunc call: void * not allowed in func proto without mem size arg FAIL
  thesofproject#124/p calls: trigger reg2btf_ids[reg->type] for reg->type > __BPF_REG_TYPE_MAX FAIL
  thesofproject#125/p calls: invalid kfunc call: reg->off must be zero when passed to release kfunc FAIL
  thesofproject#126/p calls: invalid kfunc call: don't match first member type when passed to release kfunc FAIL
  thesofproject#127/p calls: invalid kfunc call: PTR_TO_BTF_ID with negative offset FAIL
  thesofproject#128/p calls: invalid kfunc call: PTR_TO_BTF_ID with variable offset FAIL
  thesofproject#129/p calls: invalid kfunc call: referenced arg needs refcounted PTR_TO_BTF_ID FAIL
  thesofproject#130/p calls: valid kfunc call: referenced arg needs refcounted PTR_TO_BTF_ID FAIL
  thesofproject#486/p map_kptr: ref: reference state created and released on xchg FAIL

This is because the kfuncs in the loaded module are far away from
__bpf_call_base:

  ffff800002009440 t bpf_kfunc_call_test_fail1    [bpf_testmod]
  9000000002e128d8 T __bpf_call_base

The offset relative to __bpf_call_base does NOT fit in s32, which breaks
the assumption in BPF core. Enable bpf_jit_supports_far_kfunc_call() lifts
this limit.

Note that to reproduce the above result, tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config
should be applied, and run the test with JIT enabled, unpriv BPF enabled.

With this change, the test_verifier tests now all passed:

  # ./test_verifier
  ...
  Summary: 777 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Tested-by: Tiezhu Yang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Hengqi Chen <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants