Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: Revert "feat: Use Blob protocol" #134

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 17, 2024
Merged

Conversation

Peeja
Copy link
Member

@Peeja Peeja commented Oct 17, 2024

This is breaking in some cases because w3up doesn't expect effects to be links, but they sometimes are (and it should be legal for them to be). Revert, will fix and redeploy.

Reverts #132

Copy link
Contributor

Website preview 🔗✨

build log

@Peeja Peeja changed the title Revert "feat: Use Blob protocol" fix: Revert "feat: Use Blob protocol" Oct 17, 2024
@Peeja Peeja merged commit 004bfc2 into main Oct 17, 2024
5 of 6 checks passed
@Peeja Peeja deleted the revert-132-blob-protocol branch October 17, 2024 15:57
Peeja pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 17, 2024
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop*
---


##
[1.13.1](w3console-v1.13.0...w3console-v1.13.1)
(2024-10-17)


### Bug Fixes

* Revert "feat: Use Blob protocol"
([#134](#134))
([004bfc2](004bfc2))

---
This PR was generated with [Release
Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See
[documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).

Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Peeja added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 18, 2024
Peeja added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 21, 2024
Reverts #134 (which reverted
#132)

Last night, this was still failing locally. This morning it's working
again. I've done nothing but investigate.

I now think the Blob protocol was a red herring. I think something else
caused us to send a receipt that the client chokes on, and that that'll
happen regardless of this change. If it comes back, we should
investigate further, but I don't think this is what did it.
fforbeck pushed a commit to storacha/upload-service that referenced this pull request Feb 5, 2025
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop*
---


##
[1.13.1](storacha/console@w3console-v1.13.0...w3console-v1.13.1)
(2024-10-17)


### Bug Fixes

* Revert "feat: Use Blob protocol"
([#134](storacha/console#134))
([004bfc2](storacha/console@004bfc2))

---
This PR was generated with [Release
Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See
[documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).

Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
fforbeck pushed a commit to storacha/upload-service that referenced this pull request Feb 5, 2025
Reverts storacha/console#134 (which reverted
storacha/console#132)

Last night, this was still failing locally. This morning it's working
again. I've done nothing but investigate.

I now think the Blob protocol was a red herring. I think something else
caused us to send a receipt that the client chokes on, and that that'll
happen regardless of this change. If it comes back, we should
investigate further, but I don't think this is what did it.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants