Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

define PYBIND11_USE_SMART_HOLDER_AS_DEFAULT #2879

Closed
wants to merge 8 commits into from

Conversation

rwgk
Copy link
Collaborator

@rwgk rwgk commented Feb 27, 2021

IGNORE this PR please.

This is purely for running the CI against branch smart_holder (or other branches based on branch `smart_holder), with the only difference that PYBIND11_USE_SMART_HOLDER_AS_DEFAULT is defined.

@rwgk rwgk force-pushed the sh_as_default branch 3 times, most recently from 6400097 to 014a598 Compare March 3, 2021 00:45
@rwgk rwgk force-pushed the sh_as_default branch 3 times, most recently from a1bed77 to 5fa65f5 Compare March 15, 2021 19:50
@rwgk rwgk force-pushed the sh_as_default branch 4 times, most recently from 8b953d6 to 5b429f3 Compare March 19, 2021 18:07
@rwgk rwgk force-pushed the sh_as_default branch 2 times, most recently from 12981e9 to 4a00234 Compare March 22, 2021 03:07
@rwgk rwgk force-pushed the sh_as_default branch 2 times, most recently from 173c0ed to 6111f94 Compare March 25, 2021 15:27
Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve added 2 commits April 17, 2021 22:22
@rwgk
Copy link
Collaborator Author

rwgk commented Apr 20, 2021

This PR was made obsolete by #2963. Closing.

@rwgk rwgk closed this Apr 20, 2021
@rwgk rwgk deleted the sh_as_default branch April 20, 2021 21:38
@EricCousineau-TRI EricCousineau-TRI added the smart holder See: https://github.com/pybind/pybind11/blob/smart_holder/README_smart_holder.rst label Apr 26, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
smart holder See: https://github.com/pybind/pybind11/blob/smart_holder/README_smart_holder.rst
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants