Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

planner: support leading hint in join reorder optimization #34570

Merged
merged 29 commits into from
May 17, 2022

Conversation

Reminiscent
Copy link
Contributor

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: ref #29932

Problem Summary:
Support leading hints in join reorder optimization

What is changed and how it works?

Support leading hints in join reorder optimization

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  • No code

Side effects

  • Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
  • Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
  • Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

  • Affects user behaviors
  • Contains syntax changes
  • Contains variable changes
  • Contains experimental features
  • Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.

None

@Reminiscent Reminiscent added the sig/planner SIG: Planner label May 11, 2022
@Reminiscent Reminiscent requested review from qw4990 and winoros May 11, 2022 08:22
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

ti-chi-bot commented May 11, 2022

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has been approved by:

  • qw4990
  • winoros

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels May 11, 2022
@Reminiscent Reminiscent changed the title planner: support leading hints in join reorder optimization planner: support leading hint in join reorder optimization May 11, 2022
@Reminiscent
Copy link
Contributor Author

Reminiscent commented May 11, 2022

Waiting for #34380 to be merged

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels May 11, 2022
@sre-bot
Copy link
Contributor

sre-bot commented May 11, 2022

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label May 11, 2022
…-leading-hint

� Conflicts:
�	planner/core/rule_join_reorder.go
�	planner/core/rule_join_reorder_greedy.go
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. labels May 12, 2022
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels May 12, 2022
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label May 12, 2022
var usedEdges []*expression.ScalarFunction
var joinType JoinType
leadingJoin, leadingJoinGroup[0], usedEdges, joinType = s.checkConnection(leadingJoin, leadingJoinGroup[0])
leadingJoin, s.otherConds = s.makeJoin(leadingJoin, leadingJoinGroup[0], usedEdges, joinType)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It seems weird that update an inside field with an attached method like _, s.otherConds = s.makeJoin(...)...
It's another problem and we can leave it unchanged here...

Copy link
Contributor

@qw4990 qw4990 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. label May 16, 2022
@qw4990
Copy link
Contributor

qw4990 commented May 16, 2022

PTAL @winoros

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. and removed status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. labels May 16, 2022
@qw4990
Copy link
Contributor

qw4990 commented May 17, 2022

/merge

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: 19f8993

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. label May 17, 2022
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot merged commit e255739 into pingcap:master May 17, 2022
@sre-bot
Copy link
Contributor

sre-bot commented May 17, 2022

TiDB MergeCI notify

✅ Well Done! New fixed [1] after this pr merged.

CI Name Result Duration Compare with Parent commit
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/common-test ✅ all 12 tests passed 6 min 38 sec Fixed
idc-jenkins-ci/integration-cdc-test 🟢 all 34 tests passed 24 min Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/integration-common-test 🟢 all 11 tests passed 14 min Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/integration-ddl-test 🟢 all 6 tests passed 8 min 12 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/sqllogic-test-1 🟢 all 26 tests passed 7 min 52 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/tics-test 🟢 all 1 tests passed 5 min 41 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/sqllogic-test-2 🟢 all 28 tests passed 4 min 48 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/mybatis-test 🟢 all 1 tests passed 4 min 9 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/integration-compatibility-test 🟢 all 1 tests passed 3 min 10 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/plugin-test 🟢 build success, plugin test success 4min Existing passed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. sig/planner SIG: Planner size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants