-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
expression: fix different results for greatest when vectorized is off (#29438) #29916
expression: fix different results for greatest when vectorized is off (#29438) #29916
Conversation
Signed-off-by: ti-srebot <[email protected]>
[REVIEW NOTIFICATION] This pull request has been approved by:
To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review. |
/run-all-tests |
@guo-shaoge you're already a collaborator in bot's repo. |
Signed-off-by: guo-shaoge <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
/merge |
This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge. Commit hash: 45ab2e4
|
/merge |
cherry-pick #29438 to release-4.0
You can switch your code base to this Pull Request by using git-extras:
# In tidb repo: git pr https://github.com/pingcap/tidb/pull/29916
After apply modifications, you can push your change to this PR via:
Signed-off-by: guo-shaoge [email protected]
What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: close #29434
Problem Summary:
The correct semantics of greatest/least(col_datetime, col_string):
What is changed and how it works?
Check List
Tests
Side effects
Documentation
Release note