Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

expression: fix different results for greatest when vectorized is off (#29438) #29916

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 22, 2021

Conversation

ti-srebot
Copy link
Contributor

@ti-srebot ti-srebot commented Nov 18, 2021

cherry-pick #29438 to release-4.0
You can switch your code base to this Pull Request by using git-extras:

# In tidb repo:
git pr https://github.com/pingcap/tidb/pull/29916

After apply modifications, you can push your change to this PR via:

git push [email protected]:ti-srebot/tidb.git pr/29916:release-4.0-8ae81b38525b

Signed-off-by: guo-shaoge [email protected]

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #29434

Problem Summary:
The correct semantics of greatest/least(col_datetime, col_string):

  1. Convert all args as String
  2. EvalString to get arg value
  3. Parse string as datetime. If it's a valid datetime, use string(datetime) to compare. Otherwise use the result of EvalString to compare.

What is changed and how it works?

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  • No code

Side effects

  • Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
  • Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
  • Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

  • Affects user behaviors
  • Contains syntax changes
  • Contains variable changes
  • Contains experimental features
  • Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

expression: fix different results for greatest when vectorized is off.

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

ti-chi-bot commented Nov 18, 2021

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has been approved by:

  • XuHuaiyu
  • wshwsh12

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

@ti-srebot
Copy link
Contributor Author

/run-all-tests

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed Indicates that a PR should not merge because it's missing one of the release note labels. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. and removed do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed Indicates that a PR should not merge because it's missing one of the release note labels. labels Nov 18, 2021
@ti-srebot ti-srebot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. type/4.0-cherry-pick type/bugfix This PR fixes a bug. labels Nov 18, 2021
@ti-srebot
Copy link
Contributor Author

@guo-shaoge you're already a collaborator in bot's repo.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Nov 18, 2021
Signed-off-by: guo-shaoge <[email protected]>
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Nov 18, 2021
Copy link
Contributor

@XuHuaiyu XuHuaiyu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. label Nov 18, 2021
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. and removed status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. labels Nov 18, 2021
@zhouqiang-cl zhouqiang-cl added the cherry-pick-approved Cherry pick PR approved by release team. label Nov 22, 2021
@zhouqiang-cl
Copy link
Contributor

/merge

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: 45ab2e4

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. label Nov 22, 2021
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot merged commit f77a86b into pingcap:release-4.0 Nov 22, 2021
@tiancaiamao tiancaiamao deleted the release-4.0-8ae81b38525b branch November 22, 2021 07:01
@VelocityLight
Copy link

/merge

@zhouqiang-cl zhouqiang-cl added this to the v4.0.16 milestone Dec 6, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cherry-pick-approved Cherry pick PR approved by release team. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. type/bugfix This PR fixes a bug. type/4.0-cherry-pick
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants