Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

ci-operator: add golang e2e tests for operator-sdk #4031

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 18, 2019
Merged

ci-operator: add golang e2e tests for operator-sdk #4031

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 18, 2019
+77 −0

Conversation

AlexNPavel
Copy link
Contributor

Initial PR for openshift-ci E2E tests for the operator-sdk repo. Depends on operator-framework/operator-sdk#1384

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jun 11, 2019
@AlexNPavel AlexNPavel force-pushed the osdk-e2e-go branch 3 times, most recently from a91b61e to 685dfd8 Compare June 11, 2019 22:43
@openshift-merge-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/test core-valid
/test core-dry

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jun 28, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jul 10, 2019
@AlexNPavel AlexNPavel force-pushed the osdk-e2e-go branch 2 times, most recently from 4914ed9 to a57370e Compare July 10, 2019 17:45
@AlexNPavel AlexNPavel mentioned this pull request Jul 11, 2019
Merged
@AlexNPavel AlexNPavel force-pushed the osdk-e2e-go branch 2 times, most recently from 8e60dc1 to 6e312b6 Compare July 15, 2019 23:32
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jul 16, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jul 16, 2019
@AlexNPavel
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@AlexNPavel AlexNPavel changed the title [WIP] ci-operator: add golang e2e tests for operator-sdk ci-operator: add golang e2e tests for operator-sdk Jul 17, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jul 17, 2019
@AlexNPavel
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

1 similar comment
@AlexNPavel
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented Jul 17, 2019 •
edited
Loading

@AlexNPavel: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun them all:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
ci/rehearse/operator-framework/operator-sdk/master/e2e-aws 9cd2ad8295d7214a84336a41ebeefeb5f90b5257 link /test pj-rehearse

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@AlexNPavel
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@estroz
Copy link
Contributor

estroz commented Jul 18, 2019

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 18, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: AlexNPavel, estroz

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 3a90c70 into openshift:master Jul 18, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@AlexNPavel: Updated the following 3 configmaps:

  • job-config-master-presubmits configmap in namespace ci using the following files:
    • key operator-framework-operator-sdk-master-presubmits.yaml using file ci-operator/jobs/operator-framework/operator-sdk/operator-framework-operator-sdk-master-presubmits.yaml
  • ci-operator-master-configs configmap in namespace ci using the following files:
    • key operator-framework-operator-sdk-master.yaml using file ci-operator/config/operator-framework/operator-sdk/operator-framework-operator-sdk-master.yaml
  • ci-operator-master-configs configmap in namespace ci-stg using the following files:
    • key operator-framework-operator-sdk-master.yaml using file ci-operator/config/operator-framework/operator-sdk/operator-framework-operator-sdk-master.yaml

In response to this:

Initial PR for openshift-ci E2E tests for the operator-sdk repo. Depends on operator-framework/operator-sdk#1384

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@AlexNPavel AlexNPavel deleted the osdk-e2e-go branch February 3, 2023 19:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@estroz estroz Awaiting requested review from estroz

@lilic lilic Awaiting requested review from lilic

Assignees

@estroz estroz

Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@AlexNPavel @openshift-merge-robot @openshift-ci-robot @estroz