Extended.deploymentconfigs with revision history limits [Conformance] should never persist more old deployments than acceptable after being observed by the controller #11114

sosiouxme · 2016-09-27T13:40:41Z

https://ci.openshift.redhat.com/jenkins/job/test_pull_requests_origin_conformance/6409/consoleFull had a conformance test flake:

• Failure [288.339 seconds]
deploymentconfigs
/data/src/github.com/openshift/origin/test/extended/deployments/deployments.go:767
  with revision history limits
  /data/src/github.com/openshift/origin/test/extended/deployments/deployments.go:716
    should never persist more old deployments than acceptable after being observed by the controller [Conformance] [It]
    /data/src/github.com/openshift/origin/test/extended/deployments/deployments.go:715

    Expected an error to have occurred.  Got:
        <nil>: nil

    /data/src/github.com/openshift/origin/test/extended/deployments/deployments.go:696

Additional Information

This is from #11045 where I revise how the asset bundle for the console is built. I don't see how it could be related to deployments.

The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:

0xmichalis · 2016-09-27T13:46:08Z

@sosiouxme is this failure from 4 days ago? If so, it should be fixed on master by #11066

mfojtik · 2016-09-27T13:50:24Z

@sosiouxme right, this should be fixed by now, if you see this again in more recent test run feel free to re-open this.

sosiouxme · 2016-09-27T14:15:39Z

sorry for the false alarm.

soltysh · 2016-09-30T12:32:29Z

This looks like a more recent run: https://ci.openshift.redhat.com/jenkins/job/test_pull_requests_origin_conformance/6719/consoleFull although I'm wondering if that didn't fail in what I'm tracking in #11016 (comment)

soltysh · 2016-09-30T12:34:02Z

My bad, wrongly interpreted logs.

0xmichalis · 2016-10-07T13:24:01Z

@enj can you post the job that failed?

mfojtik · 2016-10-07T13:28:21Z

@Kargakis https://ci.openshift.redhat.com/jenkins/job/test_pull_requests_origin_conformance/6910/

enj · 2016-10-07T13:28:33Z

https://ci.openshift.redhat.com/jenkins/job/test_pull_requests_origin_conformance/6910/consoleFull

• Failure [486.240 seconds]
deploymentconfigs
/data/src/github.com/openshift/origin/test/extended/deployments/deployments.go:767
  with revision history limits
  /data/src/github.com/openshift/origin/test/extended/deployments/deployments.go:716
    should never persist more old deployments than acceptable after being observed by the controller [Conformance] [It]
    /data/src/github.com/openshift/origin/test/extended/deployments/deployments.go:715

    Expected error:
        <*errors.errorString | 0xc8200f9600>: {
            s: "timed out waiting for the condition",
        }
        timed out waiting for the condition
    not to have occurred

    /data/src/github.com/openshift/origin/test/extended/deployments/deployments.go:696

soltysh · 2016-10-07T13:32:06Z

I've been hitting similar, but wrt to PodDisruptionbudget in #11187:

• Failure [80.527 seconds]
[k8s.io] DisruptionController [Feature:PodDisruptionbudget]
/data/src/github.com/openshift/origin/vendor/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework/framework.go:793
  should update PodDisruptionBudget status [It]
  /data/src/github.com/openshift/origin/vendor/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/disruption.go:102

  Expected error:
      <*errors.errorString | 0xc8200dd780>: {
          s: "timed out waiting for the condition",
      }
      timed out waiting for the condition
  not to have occurred

  /data/src/github.com/openshift/origin/vendor/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/disruption.go:100

It all goes to #11016, I need to go back to that topic next week.

bparees · 2017-03-01T19:48:17Z

https://ci.openshift.redhat.com/jenkins/job/test_pull_requests_origin_future/693/testReport/junit/(root)/Extended/deploymentconfigs_with_revision_history_limits__Conformance__should_never_persist_more_old_deployments_than_acceptable_after_being_observed_by_the_controller/

mfojtik · 2017-04-26T08:13:15Z

@stevekuznetsov just saw this on GCE

bparees · 2017-04-27T17:34:11Z

and non-GCE
https://ci.openshift.redhat.com/jenkins/job/merge_pull_request_origin/489/

stevekuznetsov · 2017-04-27T17:52:14Z

@bparees Don't think that is the same flake -- openshift-eng/aos-cd-jobs#199 should have fixed the ETCD issue. There is no mention of credentials in the flake you linked.

stevekuznetsov · 2017-04-27T17:53:22Z

@smarterclayton are we running etcd data in a tmpfs in the GCE job? If not, we will continue to see etcd issues with fsync there

0xmichalis · 2017-07-28T05:50:43Z

https://ci.openshift.redhat.com/jenkins/job/test_pull_request_origin_extended_conformance_gce/4883/

mrogers950 · 2017-08-10T16:56:30Z

Failure [78.051 seconds]
deploymentconfigs
/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/_output/local/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/test/extended/deployments/deployments.go:1121
  with revision history limits [Conformance]
  /go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/_output/local/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/test/extended/deployments/deployments.go:892
    should never persist more old deployments than acceptable after being observed by the controller [It]
    /go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/_output/local/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/test/extended/deployments/deployments.go:891

    the current deployment needs to have finished before attempting to trigger a new deployment through configuration change
    Expected error:
        <*errors.errorString | 0xc421861bf0>: {
            s: "found multiple running deployments: [history-limit-2 history-limit-3]",
        }
        found multiple running deployments: [history-limit-2 history-limit-3]
    not to have occurred

    /go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/_output/local/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/test/extended/deployments/deployments.go:851

https://ci.openshift.redhat.com/jenkins/job/test_pull_request_origin_extended_conformance_install_update/3885/

smarterclayton · 2017-10-13T20:11:55Z

https://ci.openshift.redhat.com/jenkins/job/zz_origin_gce_image/503/testReport/junit/(root)/Extended/_Feature_DeploymentConfig__deploymentconfigs_with_revision_history_limits__Conformance__should_never_persist_more_old_deployments_than_acceptable_after_being_observed_by_the_controller__Suite_openshift_conformance_parallel_/

tnozicka · 2017-11-14T06:23:58Z

Feels like this issue is tracking many different failures.

I guess the etcd issue is fixed now?
found multiple running deployments was already fixed
this last failure remains to be investigated

0xmichalis · 2017-11-14T11:13:42Z

Different failure mode:

expected len of old deployments: 2 to equal dc revisionHistoryLimit: 3

https://openshift-gce-devel.appspot.com/build/origin-ci-test/pr-logs/pull/17104/test_pull_request_origin_extended_conformance_gce/11266/

jim-minter · 2017-12-07T19:27:06Z

https://openshift-gce-devel.appspot.com/build/origin-ci-test/pr-logs/pull/17666/test_pull_request_origin_extended_conformance_install/3727/

openshift-bot · 2018-03-07T23:32:51Z

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.
Exclude this issue from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle stale

openshift-bot · 2018-04-07T04:49:50Z

Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Rotten issues close after an additional 30d of inactivity.
Exclude this issue from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle rotten
/remove-lifecycle stale

stevekuznetsov · 2018-04-09T16:41:08Z

/close

sosiouxme added the kind/test-flake Categorizes issue or PR as related to test flakes. label Sep 27, 2016

mfojtik assigned 0xmichalis Sep 27, 2016

mfojtik added priority/P2 component/apps labels Sep 27, 2016

mfojtik closed this as completed Sep 27, 2016

soltysh reopened this Sep 30, 2016

soltysh closed this as completed Sep 30, 2016

enj mentioned this issue Oct 7, 2016

Make OAuth provider discoverable from within a Pod #10845

Merged

enj reopened this Oct 7, 2016

juanvallejo mentioned this issue Oct 18, 2016

UPSTREAM: 35206 update default run func for cmds containing sub-commands #11362

Merged

eparis mentioned this issue Oct 22, 2016

Support specifying StorageClass while creating volumes #11451

Merged

bparees mentioned this issue Oct 23, 2016

re-enable jenkins autoprovisioning #11065

Merged

juanvallejo mentioned this issue Oct 26, 2016

emit warning on no liveness probe defined for pods #10363

Merged

bparees mentioned this issue Oct 28, 2016

Disable auto deploy in pipeline template #11637

Closed

gnufied mentioned this issue Nov 2, 2016

flake: conformance: EmptyDir volumes should support (root,0644,default) hangs #11671

Closed

smarterclayton closed this as completed Jan 23, 2017

bparees reopened this Mar 1, 2017

bparees mentioned this issue Mar 1, 2017

Added support for Docker ARG values. #12439

Merged

eparis mentioned this issue Mar 11, 2017

Roll back fix for 1405440 #13331

Merged

sosiouxme mentioned this issue Apr 19, 2017

openshift_version: improve messaging openshift/openshift-ansible#3949

Merged

mfojtik mentioned this issue Apr 26, 2017

deploy: allow to trigger deployment when ICT is updated #13886

Merged

bparees mentioned this issue Apr 27, 2017

apply build resource defaults directly to the build pod #13825

Merged

coreydaley mentioned this issue May 8, 2017

Cleanup policy for builds #13788

Merged

jim-minter mentioned this issue May 9, 2017

net/http: TLS handshake timeout deployment flake #14109

Closed

sdodson mentioned this issue May 10, 2017

use docker_log_driver and /etc/docker/daemon.json to determine log driver openshift/openshift-ansible#4136

Merged

mfojtik added priority/P2 and removed priority/P1 labels Jun 9, 2017

deads2k mentioned this issue Jul 18, 2017

rebase to kube 1.7 on master #15234

Merged

0xmichalis mentioned this issue Jul 28, 2017

Add back origin-sdn-ovs #15468

Merged

sosiouxme mentioned this issue Aug 9, 2017

openshift_checks: enable variable conversion openshift/openshift-ansible#4922

Merged

mrogers950 mentioned this issue Aug 10, 2017

Add the --rolebinding-name option to rolebinding commands #14868

Merged

soltysh mentioned this issue Jan 11, 2018

bump(google.golang.org/grpc): 708a7f9f3283aa2d4f6132d287d78683babe55c8 #18071

Closed

openshift-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Mar 7, 2018

openshift-ci-robot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Apr 7, 2018

openshift-ci-robot closed this as completed Apr 9, 2018

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Extended.deploymentconfigs with revision history limits [Conformance] should never persist more old deployments than acceptable after being observed by the controller #11114

Extended.deploymentconfigs with revision history limits [Conformance] should never persist more old deployments than acceptable after being observed by the controller #11114

sosiouxme commented Sep 27, 2016

0xmichalis commented Sep 27, 2016

mfojtik commented Sep 27, 2016

sosiouxme commented Sep 27, 2016

soltysh commented Sep 30, 2016

soltysh commented Sep 30, 2016

0xmichalis commented Oct 7, 2016

mfojtik commented Oct 7, 2016

enj commented Oct 7, 2016

soltysh commented Oct 7, 2016

bparees commented Mar 1, 2017

mfojtik commented Apr 26, 2017

bparees commented Apr 27, 2017

stevekuznetsov commented Apr 27, 2017 •

edited

Loading

stevekuznetsov commented Apr 27, 2017 •

edited

Loading

0xmichalis commented Jul 28, 2017

mrogers950 commented Aug 10, 2017

smarterclayton commented Oct 13, 2017

tnozicka commented Nov 14, 2017

0xmichalis commented Nov 14, 2017

jim-minter commented Dec 7, 2017

openshift-bot commented Mar 7, 2018

openshift-bot commented Apr 7, 2018

stevekuznetsov commented Apr 9, 2018

Extended.deploymentconfigs with revision history limits [Conformance] should never persist more old deployments than acceptable after being observed by the controller #11114

Extended.deploymentconfigs with revision history limits [Conformance] should never persist more old deployments than acceptable after being observed by the controller #11114

Comments

sosiouxme commented Sep 27, 2016

Additional Information

0xmichalis commented Sep 27, 2016

mfojtik commented Sep 27, 2016

sosiouxme commented Sep 27, 2016

soltysh commented Sep 30, 2016

soltysh commented Sep 30, 2016

0xmichalis commented Oct 7, 2016

mfojtik commented Oct 7, 2016

enj commented Oct 7, 2016

soltysh commented Oct 7, 2016

bparees commented Mar 1, 2017

mfojtik commented Apr 26, 2017

bparees commented Apr 27, 2017

stevekuznetsov commented Apr 27, 2017 • edited Loading

stevekuznetsov commented Apr 27, 2017 • edited Loading

0xmichalis commented Jul 28, 2017

mrogers950 commented Aug 10, 2017

smarterclayton commented Oct 13, 2017

tnozicka commented Nov 14, 2017

0xmichalis commented Nov 14, 2017

jim-minter commented Dec 7, 2017

openshift-bot commented Mar 7, 2018

openshift-bot commented Apr 7, 2018

stevekuznetsov commented Apr 9, 2018

stevekuznetsov commented Apr 27, 2017 •

edited

Loading

stevekuznetsov commented Apr 27, 2017 •

edited

Loading