Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 28, 2022. It is now read-only.

[0.21] KafkaChannel hack to upgrade (#5085) #1213

Conversation

slinkydeveloper
Copy link

Signed-off-by: Francesco Guardiani [email protected]

* KafkaChannel hack

Signed-off-by: Francesco Guardiani <[email protected]>

* This hack will do the trick?

Signed-off-by: Francesco Guardiani <[email protected]>

* This is a proper hack

Signed-off-by: Francesco Guardiani <[email protected]>

* fmt

Signed-off-by: Francesco Guardiani <[email protected]>
@matzew matzew changed the title KafkaChannel hack to upgrade (#5085) [0.21] KafkaChannel hack to upgrade (#5085) Apr 19, 2021
Copy link
Member

@matzew matzew left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/approve

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 22, 2021
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: matzew, slinkydeveloper

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Apr 22, 2021
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 4a9951d into openshift:release-v0.21.0 Apr 22, 2021
@slinkydeveloper slinkydeveloper deleted the kafkachannel_hack_upgrade branch April 22, 2021 08:45
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants