Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 1877261: UPSTREAM: 973: filesystem is not resized when restoring #32

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 13, 2023

Conversation

RomanBednar
Copy link

This is a cherry-pick of: kubernetes-sigs#972

Required for OCP 4.13: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGSM-17094

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from jsafrane and tsmetana February 9, 2023 10:43
@RomanBednar
Copy link
Author

RomanBednar commented Feb 9, 2023

/hold

The sanity tests are failing, same issue was discussed upstream and those tests got disabled as there is no simple fix yet. We need to disable them in Openshift as well.

openshift/release#36246

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Feb 9, 2023
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 10, 2023

@RomanBednar: The /retest command does not accept any targets.
The following commands are available to trigger required jobs:

  • /test e2e-gcp
  • /test e2e-gcp-csi
  • /test images
  • /test test

Use /test all to run all jobs.

In response to this:

/retest ci/prow/e2e-gcp

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 10, 2023

@RomanBednar: The specified target(s) for /test were not found.
The following commands are available to trigger required jobs:

  • /test e2e-gcp
  • /test e2e-gcp-csi
  • /test images
  • /test test

Use /test all to run all jobs.

In response to this:

/test ci/prow/e2e-gcp

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@jsafrane
Copy link

/lgtm
/approve
/hold cancel
/override ci/prow/test

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Feb 13, 2023
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 13, 2023
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 13, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jsafrane, RomanBednar

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 13, 2023

@jsafrane: Overrode contexts on behalf of jsafrane: ci/prow/test

In response to this:

/lgtm
/approve
/hold cancel
/override ci/prow/test

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Feb 13, 2023
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 13, 2023

@RomanBednar: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@jsafrane
Copy link

/retitle Bug 1877261: UPSTREAM: 973: filesystem is not resized when restoring

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot changed the title UPSTREAM: 973: filesystem is not resized when restoring from snapshot/cloning to larger size than origin Bug 1877261: UPSTREAM: 973: filesystem is not resized when restoring Feb 13, 2023
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added bugzilla/severity-medium Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is medium for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Feb 13, 2023
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 13, 2023

@RomanBednar: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1877261, which is valid. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.13.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.13.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @chao007

In response to this:

Bug 1877261: UPSTREAM: 973: filesystem is not resized when restoring

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from chao007 February 13, 2023 13:55
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit c5ae6f5 into openshift:master Feb 13, 2023
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 13, 2023

@RomanBednar: Some pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

The following pull requests linked via external trackers have not merged:

These pull request must merge or be unlinked from the Bugzilla bug in order for it to move to the next state. Once unlinked, request a bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

Bugzilla bug 1877261 has not been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 1877261: UPSTREAM: 973: filesystem is not resized when restoring

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-medium Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is medium for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants