Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: $flagd.timestamp added to in-process evaluator #512

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Nov 9, 2023

Conversation

DBlanchard88
Copy link
Contributor

  • added the ability to use $flagd.timestamp
  • added testing to verify implementation of timestamp

@DBlanchard88 DBlanchard88 requested a review from a team as a code owner October 21, 2023 17:42
@DBlanchard88 DBlanchard88 changed the title $flagd.timestamp added to in-process evaluator [flagd] flagd.timestamp added to in-process evaluator Oct 21, 2023
@DBlanchard88 DBlanchard88 changed the title [flagd] flagd.timestamp added to in-process evaluator feat: flagd.timestamp added to in-process evaluator Oct 21, 2023
@toddbaert toddbaert changed the title feat: flagd.timestamp added to in-process evaluator feat: $flagd.timestamp added to in-process evaluator Oct 23, 2023
Copy link
Member

@toddbaert toddbaert left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is awesome! Thank you! And thanks for adding the solid test. I left a bunch of small nits and style feedback, but this is my only blocker for approval.

@DBlanchard88 DBlanchard88 force-pushed the timestamptest branch 2 times, most recently from 4474b83 to 5381741 Compare October 23, 2023 17:11
.github/workflows/ci.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Signed-off-by: DBlanchard88 <[email protected]>
Copy link
Member

@toddbaert toddbaert left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approved with minor nits.

DBlanchard88 and others added 2 commits October 23, 2023 16:13
…s/flagd/resolver/process/targeting/OperatorTest.java

Co-authored-by: Todd Baert <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David Blanchard <[email protected]>
…s/flagd/resolver/process/targeting/OperatorTest.java

Co-authored-by: Todd Baert <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David Blanchard <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: DBlanchard88 <[email protected]>
.github/workflows/ci.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Member

@beeme1mr beeme1mr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please fix the merge issue in the workflow ci.yml.

Signed-off-by: DBlanchard88 <[email protected]>
@thisthat thisthat dismissed beeme1mr’s stale review November 8, 2023 07:23

CI conflicts fixed

@github-actions github-actions bot requested a review from thisthat November 9, 2023 16:00
@toddbaert toddbaert merged commit 3a074b2 into open-feature:main Nov 9, 2023
@DBlanchard88 DBlanchard88 deleted the timestamptest branch November 9, 2023 17:24
DBlanchard88 pushed a commit to DBlanchard88/java-sdk-contrib that referenced this pull request Apr 29, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants