144-FEATURE-Improve-code-formatting-and-linting #150
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
NOTE: Do not merge this PR yet. First check if these settings work with your editor and general coding style. If so, we need to run prettier on every single file in the repo before merging - it will change almost every file which will make it hard to figure out changes |
tombeckenham
commented
Nov 8, 2024
zzggo
approved these changes
Nov 8, 2024
tombeckenham
deleted the
tombeckenham/144-FEATURE-Improve-code-formatting-and-linting
branch
tombeckenham
restored the
tombeckenham/144-FEATURE-Improve-code-formatting-and-linting
branch
tombeckenham
deleted the
tombeckenham/144-FEATURE-Improve-code-formatting-and-linting
branch
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I've created a setup for linting and prettier. Note that I have run prettier on all files, but not fixed any lint errors. That would be best to do on a file by file basis
Fixes #144