nix: refactor and start using flake-parts #23
Conversation
tests/default.nix
Outdated
| { withSystem, inputs, ... }: | ||
|
|
||
| { | ||
| flake.checks.x86_64-linux = withSystem "x86_64-linux" ({ pkgs, system, inputs', config, ... }: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Now that we have flake-parts we can also at least add aarch64-linux support for checks as well.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Does nixos-remote works on darwin? if not we can just add this to perSystem.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
If you have a linux remote builder yes, but not the tests.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The reason I am asking is to know whether the $system for packages can match the one for checks.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
In other words, can you do nix build .#packages.aarch64-darwin.nixos-remote on a mac and actually use it?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
You can do nix build .#packages.aarch64-darwin.nixos-remote on a mac and the script should work
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks like nixos-images only builds for x86_64-linux anyway so I guess I will keep it the way it is for now.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Also Garnix's aarch64-linux support isn't mediocre at best, it uses emulation. I personally use hercules-ci which lets me use my own runners/agents.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I actually already used it for aarch64 by building the image myself locally (see project readme). However I might also switch to hercules ci that we already deployed in nix-community.
|
@Mic92 I pushed with what you suggested, tell me if there is anything else I missed. |
|
bors merge |
No description provided.