-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
docs(PPDSC-2449): Add support to TextArea & TextField for users going over the set max length #465
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
16 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
ec2410e
feat(PPDSC-2396): overlimit maxlength support
455af23
feat(PPDSC-2396): overlimit maxlength support
f894cab
feat(PPDSC-2396): overlimit maxlength support
a4f38b5
feat(PPDSC-2396): overlimit maxlength condition correction
e1b673d
feat(PPDSC-2396): maxLength value change
428e9bf
feat(PPDSC-2396): updated character when diff falls to one
ebde9ea
feat(PPDSC-2396): design feedback changes
1d733cd
feat(PPDSC-2396): updated 0 character remanining
711e179
feat(PPDSC-2396): updated 0 character remanining
36e3829
feat(PPDSC-2396): removed ID
f229891
feat(PPDSC-2396): renamed story name
4f28edc
feat(PPDSC-2396): renamed story name
7358c34
feat(PPDSC-2396): updated snapshots
cef5d6c
feat(PPDSC-2396): updated snapshots
8dc82f8
feat(PPDSC-2396): test case updated
e1588a4
feat(PPDSC-2396): test case updated
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think you're unit test coverage check is failing because you have added branching logic here.
There are four scenarios that need tests:
You can check this by running the unit tests locally and looking at the coverage report generated.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
will do that @mstuartf
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@mstuartf
diff > 1
anddiff === 1
test scenarios already in place. So, I have done with the tests fordiff === -1
anddiff < -1
. Checked the test coverages as well and its passing 100%. Please have a look at it and let me know yours thoughts if any.