Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[simage] Fix optional dependencies #15683

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 19, 2021

Conversation

ras0219-msft
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@JackBoosY JackBoosY self-assigned this Jan 18, 2021
@JackBoosY JackBoosY added category:port-bug The issue is with a library, which is something the port should already support info:internal This PR or Issue was filed by the vcpkg team. labels Jan 18, 2021
@JackBoosY JackBoosY added the info:reviewed Pull Request changes follow basic guidelines label Jan 18, 2021
@dan-shaw dan-shaw merged commit ab077c4 into microsoft:master Jan 19, 2021
Description: Image file format library abstraction layer
Build-Depends: giflib (linux|uwp), libjpeg-turbo (linux|uwp), libpng (linux|uwp), libsndfile (linux|uwp), tiff (linux|uwp), libvorbis (linux|uwp)
Build-Depends: giflib (!windows&!osx), libjpeg-turbo (!windows&!osx), libpng (!windows&!osx), libsndfile, tiff (!windows&!osx), libvorbis, zlib (!windows&!osx)
Copy link
Contributor

@dg0yt dg0yt Jun 19, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

!windows also excludes uwp. This is different than before, and it doesn't align with the OSX_OR_WINDOWS variable in portfile.cmake. What is the desired state for UWP?
Now this caused the tiff update to 4.3.0 to pass through CI without testing simage, but hits CI for ports which happen to install tiff before simage for UWP: #17519, #18393, #18546

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
category:port-bug The issue is with a library, which is something the port should already support info:internal This PR or Issue was filed by the vcpkg team. info:reviewed Pull Request changes follow basic guidelines
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants