Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update current defaults for WEP pipelines #296

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 29, 2024
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions doc/versionHistory.rst
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ Version History
-------------

* Increased maxFracBadPixels in pipelines to 8 pixels per 200^2.
* Updated configs for TIE and Danish production pipelines to reflect current defaults

.. _lsst.ts.wep-13.0.3:

Expand Down
5 changes: 4 additions & 1 deletion pipelines/production/comCamRapidAnalysisDanishPipeline.yaml
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -11,8 +11,11 @@ tasks:
python: |
from lsst.ts.wep.task import EstimateZernikesDanishTask
config.estimateZernikes.retarget(EstimateZernikesDanishTask)
donutStampSelector.maxSelect: 2
donutStampSelector.maxSelect: 5
donutStampSelector.maxFracBadPixels: 2.0e-4
estimateZernikes.binning: 2
estimateZernikes.nollIndices:
[4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 20, 21, 22, 27, 28]

# Define pipeline steps
subsets:
Expand Down
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion pipelines/production/comCamRapidAnalysisPipeline.yaml
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ tasks:
calcZernikesTask:
class: lsst.ts.wep.task.calcZernikesTask.CalcZernikesTask
config:
estimateZernikes.nollIndices: [4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22]
estimateZernikes.nollIndices: [4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 27, 28]
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we trust 18, 19 more for TIE than for danish?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not necessarily, but my testing found that it was sometimes needed for TIE convergence. We're currently running with a max 50 iterations though, so we could probably remove them if you like

estimateZernikes.convergeTol: 10.0e-9
estimateZernikes.compGain: 0.75
estimateZernikes.compSequence: [4, 4, 6, 6, 13, 13, 13, 13]
Expand Down