Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix: HashConsensus fast lane calc when consensus is disabled #711

Conversation

skozin
Copy link
Member

@skozin skozin commented Mar 28, 2023

Fixes calculation of fast lane members subset when quorum is set to an unreachable value, i.e. when quorum > totalMembers.

@skozin skozin force-pushed the fix/hash-consnesus-fast-lane-calc branch from 63c52ab to 79d51f1 Compare March 28, 2023 11:33
@skozin skozin force-pushed the fix/hash-consnesus-fast-lane-calc branch from 79d51f1 to e735080 Compare March 28, 2023 11:34
@skozin skozin changed the title HashConsensus: fix fast lane members calc when consensus is disabled FIx: HashConsensus fast lane members calc when consensus is disabled Mar 28, 2023
@skozin skozin changed the title FIx: HashConsensus fast lane members calc when consensus is disabled FIx: HashConsensus fast lane calc when consensus is disabled Mar 28, 2023
@skozin skozin changed the title FIx: HashConsensus fast lane calc when consensus is disabled Fix: HashConsensus fast lane calc when consensus is disabled Mar 28, 2023
@skozin skozin marked this pull request as ready for review March 28, 2023 11:50
Copy link
Contributor

@TheDZhon TheDZhon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good to go 👍

@TheDZhon TheDZhon merged commit 360585f into fix/shapella-upgrade-from-rc0-to-rc1 Mar 30, 2023
@TheDZhon TheDZhon deleted the fix/hash-consnesus-fast-lane-calc branch March 30, 2023 15:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants