retain for hpa controlled Deployment resource (labels method)

[chaosi-zju]

What type of PR is this?

/kind feature

What this PR does / why we need it:

Write a controller to watch the creation of HPA. Once there is a change in HPA, It will add a label to the target resource pointed by HPA. Then we only need to check if the resource has this specific label here to determine whether we need to perform the retain operation.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

part of #4058

Special notes for your reviewer:

another mthod：#4075

we should choose just one between two.

Test Method：same as #4064

Test Report：

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

`karmada-controller-manager`: Now the replicas of deployments can be automatically retained if it is scaling with an HPA.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 5.12% and project coverage change: -0.29% ⚠️

Comparison is base (68f4ac7) 53.79% compared to head (a4828cc) 53.51%.

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #4078      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   53.79%   53.51%   -0.29%     
==========================================
  Files         232      234       +2     
  Lines       23144    23281     +137     
==========================================
+ Hits        12450    12458       +8     
- Misses      10016    10142     +126     
- Partials      678      681       +3     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	53.51% <5.12%> (-0.29%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files Changed	Coverage Δ
...pareplicassyncer/hpa_replicas_syncer_controller.go	44.59% <0.00%> (+4.35%)	⬆️
...hpareplicassyncer/hpa_replicas_syncer_predicate.go	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...trollers/hpareplicassyncer/hpa_scale_ref_worker.go	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
pkg/resourceinterpreter/default/native/retain.go	6.18% <37.50%> (+6.18%)	⬆️
...ourceinterpreter/default/native/aggregatestatus.go	70.93% <100.00%> (+0.06%)	⬆️

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[chaosi-zju]

@chaunceyjiang hello, for yesterday's hpa retain problem, I also achieve label method version, do you have time review this?

[chaosi-zju]

@lxtywypc hello, my this PR may have some conflict with your #4072, do you have time helping review my this PR? we can talk about what is the best practice to merge our two PR~

[chaosi-zju]

@XiShanYongYe-Chang it is ready to review

[chaosi-zju]

I have refactored my code to adapt to #4072, avoiding potential conflict. @XiShanYongYe-Chang

[XiShanYongYe-Chang]

Hi @chaosi-zju, #4072 has been merged, can you help rebase it?

[XiShanYongYe-Chang]

/assign

[chaosi-zju]

Hi @chaosi-zju, #4072 has been merged, can you help rebase it?

done

[lxtywypc]

@lxtywypc hello, my this PR may have some conflict with your #4072, do you have time helping review my this PR? we can talk about what is the best practice to merge our two PR~

Hi @chaosi-zju I'm sorry for noticing this late.

Thanks for your refactoring, I will help review it now.

[XiShanYongYe-Chang]

Thanks a lot~

[XiShanYongYe-Chang]

Ask an again review from @chaunceyjiang @lxtywypc

[XiShanYongYe-Chang]

Thanks~
/lgtm

[RainbowMango]

/approve

@chaunceyjiang @lxtywypc
Please feel free to leave your comments here or #4058 if we missed something :) We still have time to iterate it.

[karmada-bot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: RainbowMango

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [RainbowMango]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment