ci(deno): merge deno runtime coverage

[usualoma]

A re-creation of #3456 in a new branch.

The author should do the following, if applicable

• Add tests
• Run tests
• bun run format:fix && bun run lint:fix to format the code
• Add TSDoc/JSDoc to document the code

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 90.52%. Comparing base (0a18c02) to head (48bddfa).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3632      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   89.80%   90.52%   +0.72%     
==========================================
  Files         159      159              
  Lines       10120    10179      +59     
  Branches     2793     2843      +50     
==========================================
+ Hits         9088     9215     +127     
+ Misses       1032      962      -70     
- Partials        0        2       +2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[usualoma]

@yusukebe

There are some minor additions due to the output results for each coverage tool, but I don't think there will be any major problems.
And we can see that the code coverage for deno is now being measured.
How about merging this content?

[yusukebe]

LGTM!

[yusukebe]

Hi @usualoma

How about merging this content?

This is good! Merging now. Thanks!