chore(test): merge deno runtime coverage

[usualoma]

Checking the results in github actions...

The author should do the following, if applicable

• Add tests
• Run tests
• bun run format:fix && bun run lint:fix to format the code
• Add TSDoc/JSDoc to document the code

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 90.52%. Comparing base (0a18c02) to head (8d3a0b7).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3456      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   89.80%   90.52%   +0.72%     
==========================================
  Files         159      159              
  Lines       10120    10179      +59     
  Branches     2793     2954     +161     
==========================================
+ Hits         9088     9215     +127     
+ Misses       1032      962      -70     
- Partials        0        2       +2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[usualoma]

On Codecov, the coverage results for "coverage/deno-runtime-coverage.lcov" overwrite the results for main, resulting in a lower coverage rate. It would be nice if the results could be merged.

[usualoma]

When generating lcov format data from deno coverage, some comment lines are incorrectly treated as executable lines, resulting in unnecessary uncovered.

[usualoma]

I have created a pull request to fix this issue in deno. Whether or not it is merged is up to deno.

denoland/deno#25939

[yusukebe]

@usualoma Thanks!

[exoego]

@usualoma Deno v2.0.5 includes the change you contributed in denoland/deno#25939

[usualoma]

@exoego Thanks for telling me.

[usualoma]

I would like to continue with #3632, where the changes made by the pull request are easy to understand.