-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 133
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
blender 3.4 #418
Comments
Try it and see 🙂 This exporter isn't actively maintained, so we can't guarantee it'll work with recent Blender versions. Most people are using glTF export nowadays. |
I don't understand why you make an exporter especially to make working with Godot easier and then ... not maintain it anymore? So if I find problems with Blender 3.4, they won't be fixed too? |
Blender's glTF export has improved a lot since this exporter was created. Also, using a standard format should be preferred over a Godot-specific format when possible.
Issues may be fixed by volunteer contributors, but interest in this add-on has generally decreased over the years. This means there's no ETA for fixing issues in this exporter. |
It doesn't work in Godot 4.0 beta 12 |
@blender-girl Godot 4 has native |
OK but I still don't understand. How can I load a .blend file directly into Godot 4? Are there documentation for this? |
Not everyone working on your project may have Blender installed.
Specify a path to a Blender executable (3.0 or later) in the Editor Settings, then drag-and-drop |
Why does Godot needs to know my Blender executable? It just can read the .blend file because this file has all information? |
@blender-girl So the way it works is Godot uses your Blender installation to open |
proprietary format you say?!? Detailed .blend file structure, including python code to read it, from blender.org https://developer.blender.org/diffusion/B/browse/master/doc/blender_file_format/ |
@blender-girl
I think by "proprietary" he means there's no official If you want to import BTW I don't recommend using
As it says this is for "blend-file-format used by a certain version of blender 2.5x" Edit: |
@blender-girl I have to remind you that we have a Code of Conduct. Please stay constructive.
Regardless of which scene format you use as a source, exported projects will never contain the source files directly (or even exported glTF files). Instead, the PCK will contain Godot's own mesh and animation formats. |
If u want Godot to support .blend import using Blender 3.x for example 3.4.1, u have to:
|
@maksad1git There's no need to install Blender 3.0.0 before installing Blender 3.4.1. You can install Blender 3.4.1 directly 🙂 |
Tested double time man. Not working for me without 3.0 after the first time path changing. If i set path to 3.4, it just does nothing. After changing to 3.0 it works, and also from now i can change to any version above 3.0 and it still works. |
It's a real shame this got abandoned. It worked really well for 3.x and since I've been having endless troubles with the GLTF path for getting animation libraries with custom rigs working I was hoping this might have been an alternative route to get those in. Oh well, it was nice while it lasted, guess another GSoC project bites the dust, heh. |
I feel sorry to hear this. As people stated above "interest in this add-on has generally decreased over the years" (you can partially blame this on the poor maintenance, I take that). |
Considering the "native" .blend support is just a wrapper for launching Blender in the background and exporting a GLTF using the default settings, it wouldn't make any difference at all. By the looks of it GLTF and OBJ are the only viable formats with this gone and the BetterCollada addon in an equal state of abandonment. So I guess I'm mostly abandoning Godot for now, at least for my 3D projects, until the asset pipeline is improved. It's a real shame as I do love the engine over all, but I've wasted over a week and a half now trying to get the animation library setup to work with a custom rig that doesn't match well to the humanoid profile in the bone map setup. And the GLTF importer keeps mangling the rig, leaving out several bones and adding a few that don't belong. And due to the nature of the project, remaking an old PSX game using ripped assets from the original game, I can't really share the files that are having issues without putting Godot's foundation in a weird legal gray area, so making a ticket about it is pretty pointless as it will get ignored without example files for the problem. Sorry to dump on you, I know this isn't the place for this. Just frustrated over this one area you expect to be rock solid for 3D games to even be possible to be a total mess that derails projects and wastes weeks of effort. It makes me want to consider stuff like UPBGE just so I can avoid having to deal with import/export issues, lol. |
Please consider opening a ticket with the blender GLTF exporter folk about
the issue, it sounds worth fixing:
https://github.com/KhronosGroup/glTF-Blender-IO/
…On Fri, 13 Oct 2023 at 05:52, Uradamus ***@***.***> wrote:
Considering the "native" .blend support is just a wrapper for launching
Blender in the background and exporting a GLTF using the default settings,
it wouldn't make any difference at all. By the looks of it GLTF and OBJ are
the only viable formats with this gone and the BetterCollada addon in an
equal state of abandonment.
So I guess I'm mostly abandoning Godot for now, at least for my 3D
projects, until the asset pipeline is improved. It's a real shame as I do
love the engine over all, but I've wasted over a week and a half now trying
to get the animation library setup to work with a custom rig that doesn't
match well to the humanoid profile in the bone map setup. And the GLTF
importer keeps mangling the rig, leaving out several bones and adding a few
that don't belong.
And due to the nature of the project, remaking an old PSX game using
ripped assets from the original game, I can't really share the files that
are having issues without putting Godot's foundation in a weird legal gray
area, so making a ticket about it is pretty pointless as it will get
ignored without example files for the problem. Sorry to dump on you, I know
this isn't the place for this. Just frustrated over this one area you
expect to be rock solid for 3D games to even be possible to be a total mess
that derails projects and wastes weeks of effort. It makes me want to
consider stuff like UPBGE just so I can avoid having to deal with
import/export issues, lol.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#418 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAADNHHKCLCVNAQ3CB2ZVYLX7A36NANCNFSM6AAAAAATZ7MNXE>
.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message
ID: ***@***.***>
|
It seems the visual issues I was experiencing is something that is already known. It seems the issue is that GLTF doesn't offer any way to record bone lengths, since not all 3D packages support the concept of bone length, so they opted to just not include it at all. So the bones are technically all there, but several of them at the end of their chains are 0 length. Also what appears to be extra bones added is just Godot's (arguably incorrect) way of visualizing bones with multiple disconnected children, such as you might have with the collar bones and thighs. So even though some spots look like 3 bones, they are still just the one bone with multiple tails going off to each child. So even though they look ugly and incorrect, they should still function properly. But this was one area that I recall your add-on being a lot better, since the rigs we brought in through it all looked correct with proper lengths for all the bones back in 3.x. Either the Blender GLTF exporter needs an option to generate leaf bones on export (something they've had a ticket for for ages now and don't seem interested in addressing) or maybe some sort of script setup can be done that could dump armature info from Blender and the output can be used to reconstruct the armature to look correct on a reimported file. But doesn't seem to be a priority for anyone to fix on either side, so I'm guessing the current state will persist for some time. Still no idea why the animation library refuses to pair up with characters with identical copies of the same custom rig though. That will still take time to figure out, might actually have to go digging through all the old tickets about the new animation features for 4.x and maybe even go through the source code to make sense of what the heck is happening. There is basically zero documentation or tutorial support on the custom rig use case, since everything was done around the idea of using Mixamo apparently. But I just don't have the energy or drive for it anymore, at least not just yet, still pretty burnt out from all this. |
Hi
Is Blender 3.4 supported by the exporter?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: