-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 358
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add practice and prerequisites - 1 #1500
Conversation
Thanks for working on this! I'll do a proper review once you're done. |
Please review this as is. I'm not going to do all 120 in a single PR. It will lock up the config.json / create merge conflicts. I'm also documenting the concepts in separate PRs. It's a question of keeping things straight. I'm even finding anomalies with the concept exercises that I had not expected. I will keep PRs as draft until a review is appropriate. |
config.json
Outdated
"practices": [], | ||
"prerequisites": [], | ||
"practices": ["math-operators", "if-statements"], | ||
"prerequisites": ["math-operators", "if-statements"], |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We don't yet have a Concept Exercise that unlocks math-operators
. This means that for the website, this prerequisite will be completely ignored. I was wondering if it would make sense to guard against these types of situations by being explicit and also adding numbers
as the prerequisite. What do you think?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I thought the mandate was to create concepts for practice exercises even where there was no concept exercise illustrating the concept. Did I misunderstand?
Issue #1499 addresses the question of concepts without illustrative exercises. So far we need concepts for lambdas
, enumerables
, math-operators
, extension-methods
and yield
- after looking at 3 exercises!
Issue #1459 (mismatch between exercises.json and config.json) also relates to this. I think it will indeed cause math-operators
to be folded into numbers
. I hesitated to do it in this PR as the links in the numbers
's about.md do not include %
so text will need to be altered as part of issue #1459.
This is what I mean about keeping things straight.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I thought the mandate was to create concepts for practice exercises even where there was no concept exercise illustrating the concept. Did I misunderstand?
No you understood correctly. This is all just trial and error. I'm just thinking of the effect it would have one students for the time being while we don't have a math-operators
exercise. That is why I suggested adding the numbers
prerequisite, althought that would be a slightly duplicate prerequisite once we have math-operators
.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fair enuf. numbers
in addition. n.p.
Co-authored-by: Erik Schierboom <[email protected]>
…practice-n-prereq
I'll update a few practice exercises in config.json merge that and then add document the missing concepts separately.