Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add practice and prerequisites - 1 #1500

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Feb 12, 2021

Conversation

mikedamay
Copy link
Contributor

I'll update a few practice exercises in config.json merge that and then add document the missing concepts separately.

@mikedamay mikedamay marked this pull request as ready for review February 12, 2021 07:49
@ErikSchierboom
Copy link
Member

Thanks for working on this! I'll do a proper review once you're done.

@mikedamay
Copy link
Contributor Author

Please review this as is. I'm not going to do all 120 in a single PR. It will lock up the config.json / create merge conflicts. I'm also documenting the concepts in separate PRs. It's a question of keeping things straight. I'm even finding anomalies with the concept exercises that I had not expected.

I will keep PRs as draft until a review is appropriate.

config.json Outdated
"practices": [],
"prerequisites": [],
"practices": ["math-operators", "if-statements"],
"prerequisites": ["math-operators", "if-statements"],
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We don't yet have a Concept Exercise that unlocks math-operators . This means that for the website, this prerequisite will be completely ignored. I was wondering if it would make sense to guard against these types of situations by being explicit and also adding numbers as the prerequisite. What do you think?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@mikedamay mikedamay Feb 12, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I thought the mandate was to create concepts for practice exercises even where there was no concept exercise illustrating the concept. Did I misunderstand?

Issue #1499 addresses the question of concepts without illustrative exercises. So far we need concepts for lambdas, enumerables, math-operators, extension-methods and yield - after looking at 3 exercises!

Issue #1459 (mismatch between exercises.json and config.json) also relates to this. I think it will indeed cause math-operators to be folded into numbers. I hesitated to do it in this PR as the links in the numbers's about.md do not include % so text will need to be altered as part of issue #1459.

This is what I mean about keeping things straight.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I thought the mandate was to create concepts for practice exercises even where there was no concept exercise illustrating the concept. Did I misunderstand?

No you understood correctly. This is all just trial and error. I'm just thinking of the effect it would have one students for the time being while we don't have a math-operators exercise. That is why I suggested adding the numbers prerequisite, althought that would be a slightly duplicate prerequisite once we have math-operators.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fair enuf. numbers in addition. n.p.

@mikedamay mikedamay merged commit a49a254 into exercism:main Feb 12, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants