sync: write tests.toml with reimplements

[ErikSchierboom]

This commits adds a reimplements property to the tests.toml file to help identify re-implemented test cases:

[b9228bb1-465f-4141-b40f-1f99812de5a8]
description = "disallow first strand longer"
reimplements = "919f8ef0-b767-4d1b-8516-6379d07fcb28"

Closes #316

@ee7 This was suggested during one of the weekly meetups, and I thought it made sense. I've create a small PoC. Let me know what you think.

[ee7]

I like it. The only downside I see is that a user might think that we actually use the reimplements value in some way. But actually, it's just there to improve readability/understanding, right? Nothing bad happens if the user accidentally edits the reimplements UUID.

I think it's fine, but do you think it's worth trying to explain reimplements in the comment at the top of the file? Now that I look at it again, should we explain the implicit include = true too?

Some nitpicks in #318.

[ErikSchierboom]

I like it. The only downside I see is that a user might think that we actually use the reimplements value in some way. But actually, it's just there to improve readability/understanding, right? Nothing bad happens if the user accidentally edits the reimplements UUID.

That is correct.

I think it's fine, but do you think it's worth trying to explain reimplements in the comment at the top of the file? Now that I look at it again, should we explain the implicit include = true too?

We probably should.

[ee7]

Rebased on main - I'll fix the tests in a bit.

[ee7]

I'd like to tweak the comments at the top of the tests.toml file, but I didn't find a wording I was happy with. So let's just handle that later - I'll make the PR.

Some potential changes:

• It looks like "property" isn't actually the preferred terminology for TOML (oops) - I think it's just "key/value pair".
• We might like to mention configlet sync somewhere, rather than just "regenerating" (which might be confused with configlet generate).

I have another PR that should use this PR as a base (several PRs require changing the integration tests for sync) so I'll merge this.

[ErikSchierboom]

Thanks!

It looks like "property" isn't actually the preferred terminology for TOML (oops) - I think it's just "key/value pair".

Whoops.

We might like to mention configlet sync somewhere, rather than just "regenerating" (which might be confused with configlet generate).

Yeah I considered this. I struggled a bit with the wording, so I omitted it for now.