[BUGFIX beta] Rename private property Route#router to Router#_router #16312
Conversation
|
@Serabe ^ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes, I think we need to deprecate this.router in Ember.Route instances (and add an entry on the website to describe how to handle the deprecation).
When folks inject the router service, it would clobber this "deprecating getter" and things should work just fine...
|
Working on it |
cibernox
force-pushed
the
rename-private-property-route.router
branch
from
af3023b to
f4a28f6
Compare
cibernox
changed the title
|
@rwjblue Done. I considered this a bugfix beta and I added the deprecation in 3.1, but let me know if you prefer it to stay in canary and go in 3.2. |
yeah, lets move to 3.2 on the deprecations app. I don't want to land a last minute deprecation just before release that ends up souring the yummy goodness of 3.1... |
The fact that this private property was named router was preventing user
from injecting the router service into routes like this:
```js
export default Route.extend({
router: service()
});
```
I consider that the above code is pretty reasonable, and it should be
the private property the one that should be renamed to a clearer `_router`
name that is less likely to collide with user-defined properties or methods.
If you deem this an _intimate_ API we could consider adding a deprecated
alias, but I don't have evidence to consider it such, as `router` is too
common of a term to search for in emberobserver.
cibernox
force-pushed
the
rename-private-property-route.router
branch
from
f4a28f6 to
4690f63
Compare
|
@rwjblue Documented in the new deprecations app in ember-learn/deprecation-app#106 Updated this PR so the URL points to the right anchor in the new app. |
The fact that this private property was named
routerwas preventing usersfrom injecting the router service into routes like this:
I consider that the above code is pretty reasonable, and it should be
the private property the one that should be renamed to a clearer
_routername that is less likely to collide with user-defined properties or methods.
If you deem this an intimate API we could consider adding a deprecated
alias, but I don't have evidence to consider it such, as
routeris toocommon of a term to search for in emberobserver.
Closes #16088