Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 23, 2023. It is now read-only.

Update CoreFX Linux Arm64 exclusion list. #22697

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Mar 14, 2019
Merged

Update CoreFX Linux Arm64 exclusion list. #22697

merged 4 commits into from
Mar 14, 2019

Conversation

sandreenko
Copy link

@sandreenko sandreenko commented Feb 19, 2019 •
edited
Loading

Reenable fixed tests, exclude new failing/unstable tests.

@sandreenko sandreenko added disabled-test The test is disabled in source code against the issue test-corefx Related to a corefx test run in coreclr labels Feb 19, 2019
@sandreenko sandreenko force-pushed the cleanArm64LinuxCoreFX branch from 0349864 to f44cb06 Compare February 19, 2019 22:21
@sandreenko
Copy link
Author

@dotnet-bot test Ubuntu16.04 arm64 Cross Checked corefx_baseline Build and Test
@dotnet-bot test Ubuntu16.04 arm64 Cross Checked corefx_jitstress1 Build and Test
@dotnet-bot test Ubuntu16.04 arm64 Cross Checked corefx_jitstress2 Build and Test

@sandreenko
Copy link
Author

@dotnet-bot test Windows_NT x86 Release Innerloop Build and Test

@sandreenko sandreenko closed this Mar 11, 2019
@sandreenko sandreenko reopened this Mar 11, 2019
@sandreenko
Copy link
Author

@dotnet-bot test Ubuntu16.04 arm64 Cross Checked corefx_baseline Build and Test
@dotnet-bot test Ubuntu16.04 arm64 Cross Checked corefx_jitstress1 Build and Test
@dotnet-bot test Ubuntu16.04 arm64 Cross Checked corefx_jitstress2 Build and Test

1 similar comment
@sandreenko
Copy link
Author

@dotnet-bot test Ubuntu16.04 arm64 Cross Checked corefx_baseline Build and Test
@dotnet-bot test Ubuntu16.04 arm64 Cross Checked corefx_jitstress1 Build and Test
@dotnet-bot test Ubuntu16.04 arm64 Cross Checked corefx_jitstress2 Build and Test

@sandreenko
Copy link
Author

@dotnet-bot test Ubuntu x64 Checked Innerloop Build and Test

@sandreenko
Copy link
Author

@dotnet-bot test Ubuntu16.04 arm64 Cross Checked corefx_baseline Build and Test
@dotnet-bot test Ubuntu16.04 arm64 Cross Checked corefx_jitstress1 Build and Test
@dotnet-bot test Ubuntu16.04 arm64 Cross Checked corefx_jitstress2 Build and Test

@sandreenko
Copy link
Author

@dotnet-bot test Windows_NT arm Cross Checked Innerloop Build and Test
@dotnet-bot test Windows_NT arm64 Cross Checked Innerloop Build and Test
@dotnet-bot test Ubuntu16.04 arm64 Cross Checked corefx_baseline Build and Test
@dotnet-bot test Ubuntu16.04 arm64 Cross Checked corefx_jitstress1 Build and Test
@dotnet-bot test Ubuntu16.04 arm64 Cross Checked corefx_jitstress2 Build and Test

BruceForstall
BruceForstall approved these changes Mar 13, 2019
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@BruceForstall BruceForstall left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If the jobs pass, LGTM

@sandreenko
Copy link
Author

Yes, Ubuntu16.04 arm64 Cross Checked CoreFX jobs passed (baseline, jitstress1, jitstress2).

@sandreenko
Copy link
Author

cc @dotnet/jit-contrib

@sandreenko sandreenko merged commit 5f42cca into dotnet:master Mar 14, 2019
@sandreenko sandreenko deleted the cleanArm64LinuxCoreFX branch March 18, 2019 19:24
picenka21 pushed a commit to picenka21/runtime that referenced this pull request Feb 18, 2022
Update CoreFX Linux Arm64 exclusion list. (dotnet/coreclr#22697)
8ef6196 
* Update CoreFX Linux Arm64 exclusion list.

* Exclude System.Globalization.Calendars.Tests.

* Exclude System.Threading.Tasks.Tests.

* Exclude dotnet/coreclr#23242


Commit migrated from dotnet/coreclr@5f42cca
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Reviewers

@jashook jashook jashook approved these changes

@echesakov echesakov echesakov approved these changes

@BruceForstall BruceForstall BruceForstall approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
disabled-test The test is disabled in source code against the issue test-corefx Related to a corefx test run in coreclr
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@sandreenko @jashook @echesakov @BruceForstall