Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

7.3.0 #38

Merged
Merged

Conversation

conda-forge-admin
Copy link
Contributor

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-webservice.

I've started rerendering the recipe as instructed in #37.

If I find any needed changes to the recipe, I'll push them to this PR shortly. Thank you for waiting!

Here's a checklist to do before merging.

Fixes #37

Copy link
Contributor

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe/meta.yaml) and found it was in an excellent condition.

@Tobias-Fischer Tobias-Fischer added the automerge Merge the PR when CI passes label Sep 24, 2024
@traversaro
Copy link
Contributor

@Tobias-Fischer do you need this in fast? I would like to use this to report the issue of the missing update in cf-scripts, but if you need this fast we can wait for another update.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Sep 24, 2024

Hi! This is the friendly conda-forge automerge bot!

I considered the following status checks when analyzing this PR:

  • linter: passed
  • azure: passed

Thus the PR was passing and merged! Have a great day!

@Tobias-Fischer
Copy link
Contributor

We eventually need it for conda-forge/gz-sim-feedstock#64 but I’m in no rush at all

@traversaro
Copy link
Contributor

We eventually need it for conda-forge/gz-sim-feedstock#64 but I’m in no rush at all

Great, thanks.

@traversaro
Copy link
Contributor

I know how to reproduce the issue without waiting for an actual update, so for me we can go forward on this, thanks!

@Tobias-Fischer
Copy link
Contributor

Do you have an idea about the Windows test failure?

@traversaro
Copy link
Contributor

traversaro commented Sep 27, 2024

Output:

21/84 Test #21: COMMON_TEST_collisions_bullet-featherstone ..........................***Exception: SegFault 11.03 sec
[==========] Running 4 tests from 3 test suites.
[----------] Global test environment set-up.
[----------] 1 test from CollisionTest/0, where TypeParam = struct CollisionFeaturesList
[ RUN      ] CollisionTest/0.MeshAndPlane
No plugins with required features found in D:/bld/gz-physics7_1727157569951/work/build/bin/gz-physics7-bullet-featherstone-plugin.dll
D:\bld\gz-physics7_1727157569951\work\test\common_test\collisions.cc(66): Skipped

[  SKIPPED ] CollisionTest/0.MeshAndPlane (1 ms)
[----------] 1 test from CollisionTest/0 (1 ms total)

[----------] 2 tests from CollisionMeshTestFeaturesList
[ RUN      ] CollisionMeshTestFeaturesList.MeshOptimization
Testing plugin: gz::physics::bullet_featherstone::Plugin
[Dbg] [D:\bld\gz-physics7_1727157569951\work\bullet-featherstone\src\SDFFeatures.cc:1096] Optimizing mesh (convex_decomposition): D:\bld\gz-physics7_1727157569951\work\test\resources\chassis.dae
[Dbg] [D:\bld\gz-physics7_1727157569951\work\bullet-featherstone\src\SDFFeatures.cc:1096] Optimizing mesh (convex_hull): D:\bld\gz-physics7_1727157569951\work\test\resources\chassis.dae
[       OK ] CollisionMeshTestFeaturesList.MeshOptimization (6619 ms)
[ RUN      ] CollisionMeshTestFeaturesList.MeshDecomposition
Testing plugin: gz::physics::bullet_featherstone::Plugin
[Wrn] [D:\bld\gz-common5_1724573723174\work\graphics\src\OBJLoader.cc:202] Missing material for shape[V_shape] in OBJ file[D:\bld\gz-physics7_1727157569951\work\test\resources\v_shape.obj]
[Wrn] [D:\bld\gz-common5_1724573723174\work\graphics\src\OBJLoader.cc:202] Missing material for shape[base] in OBJ file[D:\bld\gz-physics7_1727157569951\work\test\resources\v_shape.obj]
[Dbg] [D:\bld\gz-physics7_1727157569951\work\bullet-featherstone\src\SDFFeatures.cc:1096] Optimizing mesh (convex_decomposition): D:\bld\gz-physics7_1727157569951\work\test\resources\v_shape.obj
[       OK ] CollisionMeshTestFeaturesList.MeshDecomposition (4070 ms)
[----------] 2 tests from CollisionMeshTestFeaturesList (10690 ms total)

[----------] 1 test from CollisionStaticTestFeaturesList
[ RUN      ] CollisionStaticTestFeaturesList.StaticCollisions
Testing plugin: gz::physics::bullet_featherstone::Plugin
[       OK ] CollisionStaticTestFeaturesList.StaticCollisions (299 ms)
[----------] 1 test from CollisionStaticTestFeaturesList (299 ms total)

[----------] Global test environment tear-down

As bullet-featherstone is not the default physics engine and is still in progress, I think we can just skip the test for now, also to avoid blocking everything, see #42 .

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the automerge Merge the PR when CI passes label Sep 27, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

Hi! This is the friendly conda-forge automerge bot!

Commits were made to this PR after the automerge label was added. For security reasons, I have disabled automerge by removing the automerge label. Please add the automerge label again (or ask a maintainer to do so) if you'd like to enable automerge again!

@traversaro
Copy link
Contributor

By the way, apparently also the same test for dartsim was failing: #7 (comment) .

@traversaro traversaro added the automerge Merge the PR when CI passes label Sep 27, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot merged commit f468344 into conda-forge:main Sep 27, 2024
8 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
automerge Merge the PR when CI passes
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

@conda-forge-admin please rerender
3 participants