Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

release-22.1: rowexec: close all ValueGenerators in the project set processor #86973

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 30, 2022

Conversation

blathers-crl[bot]
Copy link

@blathers-crl blathers-crl bot commented Aug 27, 2022

Backport 1/1 commits from #86964 on behalf of @yuzefovich.

/cc @cockroachdb/release


Previously, we forgot to close the value generators when a new input row
is read by the project set processor which could lead to leaking of the
resources. This is now fixed. Most of the value generators don't need to
release any resources, a few need to close their memory account
(previously this would result in a sentry report, but no actual leak
would occur in production builds), the only concerning one is
crdb_internal.payloads_for_trace where we would not close the
InternalRows iterator. But that seems like an internal debugging tool,
so most likely the users weren't impacted.

Fixes: #85418.

Release justification: bug fix.

Release note: None (It seems like in most cases the users would not see
the impact.)


Release justification:

@blathers-crl blathers-crl bot force-pushed the blathers/backport-release-22.1-86964 branch from a0db373 to 3efff7f Compare August 27, 2022 00:00
@blathers-crl
Copy link
Author

blathers-crl bot commented Aug 27, 2022

Thanks for opening a backport.

Please check the backport criteria before merging:

  • Patches should only be created for serious issues or test-only changes.
  • Patches should not break backwards-compatibility.
  • Patches should change as little code as possible.
  • Patches should not change on-disk formats or node communication protocols.
  • Patches should not add new functionality.
  • Patches must not add, edit, or otherwise modify cluster versions; or add version gates.
If some of the basic criteria cannot be satisfied, ensure that the exceptional criteria are satisfied within.
  • There is a high priority need for the functionality that cannot wait until the next release and is difficult to address in another way.
  • The new functionality is additive-only and only runs for clusters which have specifically “opted in” to it (e.g. by a cluster setting).
  • New code is protected by a conditional check that is trivial to verify and ensures that it only runs for opt-in clusters.
  • The PM and TL on the team that owns the changed code have signed off that the change obeys the above rules.

Add a brief release justification to the body of your PR to justify this backport.

Some other things to consider:

  • What did we do to ensure that a user that doesn’t know & care about this backport, has no idea that it happened?
  • Will this work in a cluster of mixed patch versions? Did we test that?
  • If a user upgrades a patch version, uses this feature, and then downgrades, what happens?

@blathers-crl blathers-crl bot requested review from DrewKimball and michae2 August 27, 2022 00:00
@blathers-crl blathers-crl bot added blathers-backport This is a backport that Blathers created automatically. O-robot Originated from a bot. labels Aug 27, 2022
@cockroach-teamcity
Copy link
Member

This change is Reviewable

Copy link
Collaborator

@DrewKimball DrewKimball left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

:lgtm:

Reviewable status: :shipit: complete! 1 of 0 LGTMs obtained (waiting on @michae2)

Previously, we forgot to close the value generators when a new input row
is read by the project set processor which could lead to leaking of the
resources. This is now fixed. Most of the value generators don't need to
release any resources, a few need to close their memory account
(previously this would result in a sentry report, but no actual leak
would occur in production builds), the only concerning one is
`crdb_internal.payloads_for_trace` where we would not close the
`InternalRows` iterator. But that seems like an internal debugging tool,
so most likely the users weren't impacted.

Release justification: bug fix.

Release note: None (It seems like in most cases the users would not see
the impact.)
@yuzefovich yuzefovich force-pushed the blathers/backport-release-22.1-86964 branch from 3efff7f to 355ff72 Compare August 29, 2022 17:58
@yuzefovich yuzefovich merged commit ff9b1bf into release-22.1 Aug 30, 2022
@yuzefovich yuzefovich deleted the blathers/backport-release-22.1-86964 branch August 30, 2022 01:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
blathers-backport This is a backport that Blathers created automatically. O-robot Originated from a bot.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants