-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Era for UPC re-reco of 2016 pPb data #46087
Era for UPC re-reco of 2016 pPb data #46087
Conversation
cms-bot internal usage |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-46087/41876
|
A new Pull Request was created by @stahlleiton for master. It involves the following packages:
@AdrianoDee, @Moanwar, @antoniovilela, @cmsbuild, @davidlange6, @fabiocos, @jfernan2, @kskovpen, @mandrenguyen, @miquork, @rappoccio, @srimanob, @subirsarkar, @sunilUIET can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
from Configuration.Eras.Modifier_highBetaStar_2018_cff import highBetaStar_2018 | ||
from Configuration.Eras.Modifier_run3_upc_cff import run3_upc | ||
|
||
Run2_2016_UPC = cms.ModifierChain(Run2_2016, egamma_lowPt_exclusive, highBetaStar_2018, run3_upc) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Unrequested comment, from a non-reviewer. Perhaps these modifiers are generic enough to be renamed without directly referencing any data taking year? It is somewhat confusing to define a 2016 era with 2018 and run3 ingredients in it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I could rename the era modifiers "highBetaStar_2018" into "highBetaStar", and "run3_upc" into "upc", if that helps
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Changed the modifier "highBetaStar_2018" to "highBetaSta" in 5573b8f
3542f83
to
8238ddb
Compare
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-46087/41957
|
Pull request #46087 was updated. @AdrianoDee, @Moanwar, @antoniovilela, @atpathak, @cmsbuild, @consuegs, @davidlange6, @fabiocos, @jfernan2, @kskovpen, @mandrenguyen, @miquork, @perrotta, @rappoccio, @srimanob, @subirsarkar, @sunilUIET can you please check and sign again. |
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ | |||
# GlobalTag for MC production (p-Pb collisions) with realistic alignment and calibrations for Run2 | |||
'run2_mc_pa' : '131X_mcRun2_pA_v3', | |||
# GlobalTag for Run2 data reprocessing | |||
'run2_data' : '140X_dataRun2_v2', | |||
'run2_data' : '141X_dataRun2_v1', |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please replace with
'run2_data' : '141X_dataRun2_v1', | |
'run2_data' : '141X_dataRun2_v2', |
(which contains the updated DeDxCalibration tag for the 2016 pA reReco, see https://cms-talk.web.cern.ch/t/gt-offline-prompt-update-of-dedxcalibration-tag-driven-from-2016-pa-data-for-141x-datarun2/50752/3)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Implemented in 5573b8f
+1 Size: This PR adds an extra 104KB to repository Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+alca
|
+1 |
@cms-sw/upgrade-l2 @cms-sw/pdmv-l2 : would you kindly review/sign ? |
+Upgrade |
+pdmv |
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will be automatically merged. |
PR description:
This PR creates a new era "Run2_2016_UPC" meant for the re-reco of 2016 pPb data using the UPC reconstruction. It includes the same era modifiers (highBetaStar, egamma_lowPt_exclusive and run3_upc) introduced in #43378 on top of the Run2_2016 era.
A new relval 142.903 is added to test the new era.
More details on the validations done are documented in the slide
@mandrenguyen
PR validation:
Tested using the relvals 180,180.1,181,181.1,141.901,142.901,142.903
If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:
This PR will be backported to 14_1_X.