Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Era for UPC re-reco of 2016 pPb data #46087

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 9, 2024

Conversation

stahlleiton
Copy link
Contributor

@stahlleiton stahlleiton commented Sep 21, 2024

PR description:

This PR creates a new era "Run2_2016_UPC" meant for the re-reco of 2016 pPb data using the UPC reconstruction. It includes the same era modifiers (highBetaStar, egamma_lowPt_exclusive and run3_upc) introduced in #43378 on top of the Run2_2016 era.

A new relval 142.903 is added to test the new era.

More details on the validations done are documented in the slide

@mandrenguyen

PR validation:

Tested using the relvals 180,180.1,181,181.1,141.901,142.901,142.903

If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:

This PR will be backported to 14_1_X.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Sep 21, 2024

cms-bot internal usage

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-46087/41876

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @stahlleiton for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • Configuration/Eras (operations)
  • Configuration/PyReleaseValidation (upgrade, pdmv)
  • Configuration/StandardSequences (operations)
  • RecoHI/HiTracking (reconstruction)
  • RecoTracker/IterativeTracking (reconstruction)

@AdrianoDee, @Moanwar, @antoniovilela, @cmsbuild, @davidlange6, @fabiocos, @jfernan2, @kskovpen, @mandrenguyen, @miquork, @rappoccio, @srimanob, @subirsarkar, @sunilUIET can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@AnnikaStein, @GiacomoSguazzoni, @JanFSchulte, @Martin-Grunewald, @VinInn, @VourMa, @dgulhan, @fabiocos, @felicepantaleo, @gpetruc, @jazzitup, @kurtejung, @makortel, @mandrenguyen, @missirol, @mmusich, @mtosi, @rovere, @sameasy, @slomeo, @yenjie, @yetkinyilmaz this is something you requested to watch as well.
@antoniovilela, @mandrenguyen, @rappoccio, @sextonkennedy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

from Configuration.Eras.Modifier_highBetaStar_2018_cff import highBetaStar_2018
from Configuration.Eras.Modifier_run3_upc_cff import run3_upc

Run2_2016_UPC = cms.ModifierChain(Run2_2016, egamma_lowPt_exclusive, highBetaStar_2018, run3_upc)
Copy link
Contributor

@mmusich mmusich Sep 23, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Unrequested comment, from a non-reviewer. Perhaps these modifiers are generic enough to be renamed without directly referencing any data taking year? It is somewhat confusing to define a 2016 era with 2018 and run3 ingredients in it.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@stahlleiton stahlleiton Sep 23, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I could rename the era modifiers "highBetaStar_2018" into "highBetaStar", and "run3_upc" into "upc", if that helps

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Changed the modifier "highBetaStar_2018" to "highBetaSta" in 5573b8f

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-46087/41957

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@
# GlobalTag for MC production (p-Pb collisions) with realistic alignment and calibrations for Run2
'run2_mc_pa' : '131X_mcRun2_pA_v3',
# GlobalTag for Run2 data reprocessing
'run2_data' : '140X_dataRun2_v2',
'run2_data' : '141X_dataRun2_v1',
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please replace with

Suggested change
'run2_data' : '141X_dataRun2_v1',
'run2_data' : '141X_dataRun2_v2',

(which contains the updated DeDxCalibration tag for the 2016 pA reReco, see https://cms-talk.web.cern.ch/t/gt-offline-prompt-update-of-dedxcalibration-tag-driven-from-2016-pa-data-for-141x-datarun2/50752/3)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Implemented in 5573b8f

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 3, 2024

+1

Size: This PR adds an extra 104KB to repository
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-13c565/41904/summary.html
COMMIT: 5573b8f
CMSSW: CMSSW_14_2_X_2024-10-02-2300/el8_amd64_gcc12
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/46087/41904/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

perrotta commented Oct 3, 2024

+alca

  • The new workflow 142.903 was tested running without errors in lxplus

@jfernan2
Copy link
Contributor

jfernan2 commented Oct 3, 2024

+1

@stahlleiton
Copy link
Contributor Author

@cms-sw/upgrade-l2 @cms-sw/pdmv-l2 : would you kindly review/sign ?

@Moanwar
Copy link
Contributor

Moanwar commented Oct 8, 2024

+Upgrade

@AdrianoDee
Copy link
Contributor

+pdmv

@mandrenguyen
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 9, 2024

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will be automatically merged.

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit b8676ee into cms-sw:master Oct 9, 2024
11 checks passed
@stahlleiton stahlleiton deleted the Era_Run2_2016_UPC_CMSSW_14_2_X branch October 12, 2024 11:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants