-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
GEM onlineDQM trigger primitive with CMSSW_14_1_0_pre5 #45489
GEM onlineDQM trigger primitive with CMSSW_14_1_0_pre5 #45489
Conversation
…with cms-merge-topic
cms-bot internal usage |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-45489/40957 |
A new Pull Request was created by @Dongwoon77 for master. It involves the following packages:
@antoniovagnerini, @cmsbuild, @nothingface0, @rvenditti, @syuvivida, @tjavaid can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test |
+1 Size: This PR adds an extra 216KB to repository
Comparison SummarySummary:
|
@Dongwoon77 , we are testing this PR on our playback machines using |
Hi @tjavaid, Thanks for your management. I'm one of GEM DQM developers, and me and @Dongwoon77 found that many plots are missing. Not only the new plots but also most of the existing plots are being displayed with "not available" message, while they appear in the central onlineDQM as well. The change in the codes does not affect the existing ones. Even, as I understand, if the plots are not made, then they should not appear at all in the folders (not in the "layouts" area), not displaying "not available" message. I wonder what happens on the original ROOT DQM file, but I have no idea how to retrieve it. Is there a way to download it? Also, how can I reproduce the playback result by myself? |
Hi @quark2 , @Dongwoon77 , could you please have a look now on the GUI plots ? The histograms seem being populated now. (We just restarted the run at playback. Perhaps GEM client was crashing in previous iteration) |
Hi @tjavaid, Thanks a lot! I've checked that the new plots are all available. We still need to check whether they are all sensible, though. We will notice if we have something else. Best regards, |
Hi @tjavaid. I've checked the GUI plots, I think that is look good. Thank you. |
Hi @Dongwoon77 , thanks for the cross check. Could you please make its backport PR to |
+1
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @mandrenguyen, @antoniovilela, @rappoccio, @sextonkennedy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
In this PR, GEM onlineDQM plots for trigger primitive have been implemented
PR validation:
Tests are done with
cmsRun $CMSSW_BASE/src/DQM/Integration/python/clients/gem_dqm_sourceclient-live_cfg.py unitTest=True runNumber=379866 dataset=/ExpressPhysics/Run2024C-Express-v1/FEVT minLumi=20 maxLumi=40 eventsPerLumi=50000
andrunTheMatrix.py -l limited -i all --ibeos
since it makes effects on P5@jshlee @watson-ij @quark2 @hcai0520 @giovanni-mocellin