-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Hcalnano autonano #44492
Hcalnano autonano #44492
Conversation
enable nano |
type hcal |
cms-bot internal usage |
A new Pull Request was created by @vlimant for master. It involves the following packages:
@davidlange6, @hqucms, @miquork, @cmsbuild, @AdrianoDee, @vlimant, @fabiocos, @rappoccio, @sunilUIET, @srimanob, @subirsarkar, @antoniovilela can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test |
-1 Failed Tests: RelVals-INPUT RelVals-NANO RelVals-INPUT
RelVals-NANO
Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+1 |
can we please have the remaining signatures, or comments for this trivial PR ? @cms-sw/operations-l2 @cms-sw/pdmv-l2 @cms-sw/upgrade-l2. |
'-n' : '100',}, | ||
steps['NANO_data13.0']]) | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I imagine this, while unrelated with this PR, is just that you took the chance to implement the merge
+ steps['NANO_data13.0']
syntax also for @MUDPG
auto NANO.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yes, sorry indeed.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No worries of course
+pdmv |
ping @cms-sw/upgrade-l2 |
Please bring PRs that are taking time to get all signatures during the weekly ORP meeting, where we can also discuss the requested backports. |
I am away this week, I'll try to connect to the ORP next week if time permits |
+Upgrade |
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will be automatically merged. |
PR description:
harmonise how hcal DPG nano are configured and tested (#43961)
FYI: @DryRun
PR validation:
nano matrix succeded
a backport "might" be included in #44428