Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reco changes for centralityBin in DQM #12002

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 29, 2015
Merged

Reco changes for centralityBin in DQM #12002

merged 2 commits into from
Oct 29, 2015

Conversation

smdogra
Copy link
Contributor

@smdogra smdogra commented Oct 20, 2015

To include centralityBin distribution in the DQM monitoring. For this, changes are requested in the HI reco sequence

Reconstruction_HI_cff.py
RecoHiCentrality_EventContent_cff.py
and in the
CentralityDQM module.
CentralityDQM_cfi.py

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @smdogra for CMSSW_7_6_X.

Reco changes for centralityBin in DQM

It involves the following packages:

DQM/Physics
RecoHI/Configuration
RecoHI/HiCentralityAlgos

@cvuosalo, @slava77, @cmsbuild, @deguio, @danduggan, @vanbesien can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@rappoccio, @azsigmon, @MiheeJo, @jazzitup, @richard-cms, @echapon, @yenjie, @kurtejung, @istaslis, @mandrenguyen, @dgulhan, @yetkinyilmaz this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
If you are a L2 or a release manager you can ask for tests by saying 'please test' in the first line of a comment.
@Degano you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Oct 20, 2015

@cmsbuild please test
@smdogra I suppose you will make a PR for 75X as well.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/9079/console

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-1

Tested at: 5ebae90
I found errors in the following addon tests:

cmsDriver.py RelVal -s HLT:HIon,RAW2DIGI,L1Reco,RECO --mc --scenario=HeavyIons -n 10 --conditions auto:run2_mc_HIon --relval 9000,50 --datatier "RAW-HLT-RECO" --eventcontent FEVTDEBUGHLT --customise=HLTrigger/Configuration/CustomConfigs.L1THLT --customise=SLHCUpgradeSimulations/Configuration/postLS1Customs.customisePostLS1_HI --magField 38T_PostLS1 --processName=HLTRECO --filein file:RelVal_Raw_HIon_MC.root --fileout file:RelVal_Raw_HIon_MC_HLT_RECO.root : FAILED - time: date Wed Oct 21 00:30:39 2015-date Wed Oct 21 00:18:25 2015 s - exit: 16640

you can see the results of the tests here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-12002/9079/summary.html

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Oct 21, 2015

An exception of category 'NoProxyException' occurred while
   [0] Processing run: 1 lumi: 1 event: 1
   [1] Running path 'reconstruction_step'
   [2] Calling event method for module CentralityBinProducer/'centralityBin'
Exception Message:
No data of type "CentralityTable" with label "HFtowers" in record "HeavyIonRcd"
 Please add an ESSource or ESProducer to your job which can deliver this data.

the error seems real
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-12002/9079/addOnTests/hlt_mc_HIon/cmsDriver.py_RelVal_-s_HLT:HIon,RAW2DIGI,L1Reco,RECO_--mc_--scenario=HeavyIons_-n_10_--conditions_auto:run2_mc_HIon_--relval_9000,50_--datatier_RAW-H.log

The same test passes in the reference IB
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/cgi-bin/buildlogs/slc6_amd64_gcc493/CMSSW_7_6_X_2015-10-20-1100/addOnTests/logs/cmsDriver-hlt_mc_HIon_cmsDriver.py_RelVal_-s_HLT:HIon,RAW2DIGI,L1Reco,RECO_--mc_--scenario=HeavyIons_-n_10_--conditions_auto:run2_mc_HIon_--relval_9000,50_--datatier_RAW-H.log

call
addOnTests.py -t hlt_mc_HIon
to reproduce

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Oct 21, 2015

@smdogra
I suppose the fix to the addOnTest issue is coming soon.
Please confirm.

Thank you.

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

mmusich commented Oct 22, 2015

@slava77 there might be a missing label in the MC Heavy Ion GTs (the inital request was to have 2 separate labels for data/mc but at some point this should have changed). Either this line
centralitybincollection = cms.InputTag("centralityBin","HFtowers")
is changed to consume some of the available MC labels or we need to modify the Global Tags.
@diguida

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

mmusich commented Oct 23, 2015

@smdogra GTs with the label HFTower for MC are available: #12079

@smdogra
Copy link
Contributor Author

smdogra commented Oct 26, 2015

@slava77 Can we test it again or do we need to have new PR ?

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

mmusich commented Oct 26, 2015

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/9203/console

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

mmusich commented Oct 26, 2015

@smdogra looks like #12079 made CMSSW_7_6_X_2015-10-25-2300. If an IB past that one is used to test you should have your HFtowers labels available Diff among GT.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cvuosalo
Copy link
Contributor

+1

For #12002 5ebae90

Adding the centrality bin distribution for Heavy Ions.

The code changes are satisfactory, and Jenkins tests against baseline CMSSW_7_6_X_2015-10-26-1100 show no significant differences except the expected addition of the centrality bin distribution for Heavy Ion workflow 140.53. An example is shown below:
centrality

@deguio
Copy link
Contributor

deguio commented Oct 28, 2015

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_6_X IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

@cvuosalo cvuosalo mentioned this pull request Oct 28, 2015
@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@diguida
Copy link
Contributor

diguida commented Oct 30, 2015

@smdogra the 75X back-port of #12002 is ready, together with GT: #12213

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants