Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added paths that are removde JetIdCleaned suffix (MonoJet, PhotonMET,and PureMET). Optimized binning of sumEt plot in MonoJet category. #11616

Closed
wants to merge 13 commits into from

Conversation

ryonamin
Copy link

@ryonamin ryonamin commented Oct 2, 2015

Backport from #11596 to 75X.

This PR has been already merged with #11456 and #11151 which PRs are currently pending, so that this PR can be merged without conflicting even after #11456 and #11151 being merged. This is why we see many changes.
Please let me know if this doesn't work.

Also added the changes of #11619.

Ryo Yonamine added 12 commits August 31, 2015 17:08
…ug print (dump # of HLT passed events). Replace cout to DebugLog. Updated paths (PhotonMET, PureMET, DiPhoton, HighPtPhoton).)
DST_L1HTT125ORHTT150ORHTT175_CaloScouting_v ==> DST_CaloJet40_CaloScouting_v
to make this change at later PR.
"DST_HT450_PFReco_PFBTagCSVReco_PFScouting_v",
"DST_L1HTT125ORHTT150ORHTT175_PFReco_PFBTagCSVReco_PFScouting_v",
"DST_CaloJet40_PFReco_PFBTagCSVReco_PFScoutingo"
==>
"DST_HT450_PFScouting_v",
"DST_L1HT_PFScouting_v",
"DST_CaloJet40_PFScouting_v"_v"
to make these changes at later PR.
…and PureMET). Optimized binning of sumEt plot in MonoJet category.
@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 2, 2015

A new Pull Request was created by @ryonamin (Ryo Yonamine) for CMSSW_7_5_X.

Added paths that are removde JetIdCleaned suffix (MonoJet, PhotonMET,and PureMET). Optimized binning of sumEt plot in MonoJet category.

It involves the following packages:

HLTriggerOffline/Exotica

@cmsbuild, @danduggan, @vanbesien, @deguio can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
If you are a L2 or a release manager you can ask for tests by saying 'please test' in the first line of a comment.
@Degano you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 2, 2015

Pull request #11616 was updated. @cmsbuild, @danduggan, @vanbesien, @deguio can you please check and sign again.

@deguio
Copy link
Contributor

deguio commented Oct 5, 2015

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 5, 2015

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

@deguio
Copy link
Contributor

deguio commented Oct 5, 2015

to simplify my job could you please list all the correspondent PR in 76 and close the pending PR superseded by this one?
thanks in advance,
F.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 5, 2015

@ryonamin
Copy link
Author

ryonamin commented Oct 5, 2015

Here is the list
(corresponding 76X-PRs of 11456 and 11151)
10907
10974
11219
11150
11453

(newly added)
11596
11619

@ryonamin
Copy link
Author

ryonamin commented Oct 5, 2015

I closed 11456 and 11151.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 5, 2015

@deguio
Copy link
Contributor

deguio commented Oct 14, 2015

+1
this should restore the consistency with 76x

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_5_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_7_6_X is complete. This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

Hi - I'm cleaning up the 75x CMSSW release queue, so closing issues not directly related to analysis or finalizing the HI MC production. Please make sure these requests are included in the 80x release already. Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants