Use our shared prettier config

[ahuth]

Summary:

Not sure if this was intended from #1457 or not, but it turns out we aren't actually using our shared prettier config. More deets inline.

This PR

• Fixes that so we're using prettier-config-edu.
• Introduces an override to avoid a large diff. We may want to remove this override at some point, though.

Test Plan:

• Wrote automated tests
• CI tests / new tests are not applicable
• Manually tested my changes, but I want to keep the details secret
• Manually tested my changes, and here are the details:
  • Introduced prettier violations
  • Observed prettier complaining/fixing

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #1524 (c98ea51) into main (bc21f85) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1524   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   91.97%   91.97%           
=======================================
  Files         284      284           
  Lines        4300     4300           
  Branches      793      793           
=======================================
  Hits         3955     3955           
  Misses        320      320           
  Partials       25       25           

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

[ahuth]

prettier-config-edu isn't a plugin, so adding it here wasn't actually using it.

Or at least wasn't using it for the rules config. But maybe was somehow configuring the Tailwind plugin 🤔 ?

[github-actions]

size-limit report 📦

Path	Size
components	121.1 KB (0%)
styles	3.1 KB (0%)

[ahuth]

These overrides were the clue that our shared config wasn't being used, since the shared config has the same values.

[ghost]

So the end result was the same because the overrides, but now we're actually using the correct config?

[ahuth]

So the end result was the same because the overrides, but now we're actually using the correct config?

That's right