-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 812
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Ratelimit integration test #5773
Ratelimit integration test #5773
Conversation
57a93b3
to
a824cd4
Compare
a824cd4
to
cb2e457
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nice!
Codecov Report
Additional details and impacted filessee 2 files with indirect coverage changes Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.
|
Adding a seperate suite enables us to se the ratelimits only for this specific test, and not for all the integration tests. Similar to the async_wf_test
031a1ba
to
2a61173
Compare
2a61173
to
d471c88
Compare
Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 018eae59-c67e-4c41-bd99-0c7282f5ebcfDetails
💛 - Coveralls |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: I recommend adding
Note, this will fail until this PR is merged: #5772
What changed?
Adds integration test for the workflowID specific ratelimits
Why?
We need to make sure the requests and errors are passed correctly all the way to and from the client.
How did you test it?
N/A
Potential risks
Release notes
Documentation Changes