fix: fe/pagespeed details empty view, resolves #1674 #1675
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces modifications to several React components across the client-side application. Key changes include updating the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
✨ Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
Client/src/Components/MonitorTimeFrameHeader/index.jsx (1)
56-59: Consider extracting date range text to constantsThe date range text could be moved to a constant object for better maintainability.
+const DATE_RANGE_TEXT = { + day: "24 hours", + week: "7 days", + month: "30 days" +}; + <Typography variant="body2"> Showing statistics for past{" "} - {dateRange === "day" ? "24 hours" : dateRange === "week" ? "7 days" : "30 days"}. + {DATE_RANGE_TEXT[dateRange]}. </Typography>Client/src/Pages/PageSpeed/Details/index.jsx (1)
76-80: Consider making dateRange dynamicThe dateRange prop is hardcoded to "day" while hasDateRange is false. Since the date range isn't changeable, consider removing the dateRange prop entirely when hasDateRange is false.
<MonitorTimeFrameHeader shouldRender={!isLoading} - dateRange={"day"} hasDateRange={false} />Client/src/Pages/Uptime/Details/index.jsx (1)
94-99: Mom's spaghetti moment: Let's make this prop more flexible! 🍝The hasDateRange prop could be made optional with a default value in the MonitorTimeFrameHeader component, reducing the need for explicit boolean props.
Consider updating MonitorTimeFrameHeader to include a default value:
- hasDateRange={true}And in the MonitorTimeFrameHeader component:
MonitorTimeFrameHeader.defaultProps = { hasDateRange: true };
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
Client/src/Components/MonitorStatusHeader/ConfigButton/index.jsx(3 hunks)Client/src/Components/MonitorStatusHeader/index.jsx(3 hunks)Client/src/Components/MonitorTimeFrameHeader/index.jsx(2 hunks)Client/src/Pages/PageSpeed/Details/index.jsx(3 hunks)Client/src/Pages/Uptime/Details/index.jsx(3 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (9)
Client/src/Components/MonitorStatusHeader/ConfigButton/index.jsx (2)
6-6: Props and navigation updates look solid!The addition of the required
pathprop and dynamic navigation path construction makes the component more reusable.Also applies to: 17-17
37-38: Good type safety improvements!Making
monitorIdandpathrequired props helps prevent runtime errors.Client/src/Components/MonitorStatusHeader/index.jsx (2)
11-11: Clean prop passing implementation!The path prop is properly passed through to ConfigButton, maintaining good component composition.
Also applies to: 41-43
Line range hint
50-54: PropTypes declaration is on point!Required path prop is properly typed.
Client/src/Components/MonitorTimeFrameHeader/index.jsx (1)
6-11: Props structure looks clean!Good default value for hasDateRange prop.
Client/src/Pages/PageSpeed/Details/index.jsx (2)
46-61: Empty state handling looks good!Clean implementation of the empty state with proper component composition.
Line range hint
18-21: Consider updating BREADCRUMBS pathThe commented code suggests there might be a better way to handle the details path.
✅ Verification successful
The empty path in BREADCRUMBS is correct, eh!
The current implementation using an empty path for the details breadcrumb is the right approach since it represents the current page location. The commented-out code can be safely removed.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check how breadcrumb paths are handled in other detail views rg -A 2 'BREADCRUMBS.*=.*\[' src/Pages/*/Details/Length of output: 114
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Find Details directories and search for breadcrumb patterns fd -t d 'Details$' | xargs rg -l 'BREADCRUMBS.*=.*\[' # Get full context of the current file cat Client/src/Pages/PageSpeed/Details/index.jsxLength of output: 2839
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the Uptime details implementation cat Client/src/Pages/Uptime/Details/index.jsxLength of output: 3714
Client/src/Pages/Uptime/Details/index.jsx (2)
4-4: Yo, this import change is straight fire! 🔥The switch from TimeFramePicker to MonitorTimeFrameHeader is clean and follows the component renaming convention.
Line range hint
84-88: Ayy, let's verify this path prop real quick! 👀The path="uptime" matches the breadcrumb path constant, but let's make sure it's used consistently across the app.
✅ Verification successful
Yo dawg, the path prop is straight fire! 🔥
All MonitorStatusHeader usages are consistently passing the path prop with values matching their feature areas:
- "uptime" for Uptime feature
- "pagespeed" for PageSpeed feature
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for other MonitorStatusHeader usages to verify path prop consistency rg -l 'MonitorStatusHeader' | xargs rg 'path=' -A 2Length of output: 906
![llamapreview[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1023541?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Auto Pull Request Review from LlamaPReview
1. Overview
1.1 PR Summary
- Business value and requirements alignment: This PR aims to improve the user experience by adding an empty view to the PageSpeed details page when no checks exist. It also fixes minor bugs related to configuration breadcrumbs and paths, and refactors reusable components.
- Key components modified:
Client/src/Pages/PageSpeed/Details/index.jsx,Client/src/Pages/Uptime/Details/index.jsx,Client/src/Components/MonitorStatusHeader/index.jsx,Client/src/Components/MonitorTimeFrameHeader/index.jsx - Impact assessment: The changes in this PR primarily affect the front-end (FE) components and pages, specifically the PageSpeed details view. They introduce an empty view to handle cases where no checks exist, which could impact user experience and navigation flow. The refactoring of reusable components and the introduction of a new
MonitorTimeFrameHeadercomponent could have ripple effects across other pages and components that use these shared elements. Additionally, the changes to routing could impact the consistency of the user interface across different pages. - System dependencies and integration impacts: The changes in this PR interact with several FE components, including
MonitorStatusHeader,MonitorTimeFrameHeader, and the PageSpeed details page itself. It also touches the routing configuration, which could have implications for system-wide navigation.
2. Detailed Technical Analysis
2.1 Code Logic Deep-Dive
Core Logic Changes
- Client/src/Pages/PageSpeed/Details/index.jsx
- Submitted PR Code:
// ... (previous code)
if (!isLoading && monitor?.checks?.length === 0) {
return (
<Stack gap={theme.spacing(10)}>
<Breadcrumbs list={BREADCRUMBS} />
<MonitorStatusHeader
path={"pagespeed"}
isAdmin={isAdmin}
monitor={monitor}
/>
<GenericFallback>
<Typography>There is no history for this monitor yet.</Typography>
</GenericFallback>
</Stack>
);
}
// ... (remaining code)- Analysis:
- Current logic and potential issues: The PR introduces an empty view for the PageSpeed details page when no checks exist. However, the current logic does not consider the case where the monitor is still loading. In this scenario, the empty view will not be displayed, and the user will see a blank screen instead.
- Edge cases and error handling: The current implementation does not handle the case where the monitor is still loading. Additionally, it does not provide any loading indicator or feedback to the user while the monitor data is being fetched.
- **Cross-component impact **: The changes in this file could impact the user experience and navigation flow, as the empty view is displayed when no checks exist.
- **Business logic considerations **: The empty view should provide a clear and concise message to the user, indicating that there is no history for the monitor yet. It should also provide a way for the user to refresh or retry the monitor, if necessary.
- LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements:
if (isLoading) {
return <CircularProgress />;
}
if (!isLoading && monitor?.checks?.length === 0) {
return (
<Stack gap={theme.spacing(10)}>
<Breadcrumbs list={BREADCRUMBS} />
<MonitorStatusHeader
path={"pagespeed"}
isAdmin={isAdmin}
monitor={monitor}
/>
<GenericFallback>
<Typography>There is no history for this monitor yet.</Typography>
<Button onClick={() => fetchMonitor()}>Refresh</Button>
</GenericFallback>
</Stack>
);
}-
Improvement rationale:
- Technical benefits: Adding a loading indicator improves the user experience by providing feedback that the application is working. Additionally, providing a refresh button allows the user to retry the monitor if it fails to load initially.
- Business value: Improving the user experience and providing clear feedback to the user can lead to increased user satisfaction and engagement with the application.
- Risk assessment: The suggested improvements reduce the risk of user confusion or frustration by providing clear feedback and a way to retry the monitor if it fails to load initially.
-
Client/src/Pages/Uptime/Details/index.jsx
- Submitted PR Code:
// ... (previous code)
<MonitorTimeFrameHeader
shouldRender={!monitorIsLoading}
hasDateRange={true}
dateRange={dateRange}
setDateRange={setDateRange}
/>
// ... (remaining code)- Analysis:
- Current logic and potential issues: The PR introduces the
MonitorTimeFrameHeadercomponent to the Uptime details page. However, the current logic does not consider the case where the monitor is still loading. In this scenario, theMonitorTimeFrameHeadercomponent will not be displayed, and the user will see a blank space instead. - Edge cases and error handling: The current implementation does not handle the case where the monitor is still loading. Additionally, it does not provide any loading indicator or feedback to the user while the monitor data is being fetched.
- **Cross-component impact **: The changes in this file could impact the user experience and layout of the Uptime details page, as the
MonitorTimeFrameHeadercomponent is displayed above the chart boxes. - **Business logic considerations **: The
MonitorTimeFrameHeadercomponent should provide a way for the user to filter the data by time frame. It should also provide a clear and concise label for the currently selected time frame.
- Current logic and potential issues: The PR introduces the
- LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements:
if (monitorIsLoading) {
return <CircularProgress />;
}
return (
<>
<MonitorTimeFrameHeader
shouldRender={!monitorIsLoading}
hasDateRange={true}
dateRange={dateRange}
setDateRange={setDateRange}
/>
{/* ... (remaining code) */}
</>
);-
Improvement rationale:
- Technical benefits: Adding a loading indicator improves the user experience by providing feedback that the application is working. Additionally, wrapping the
MonitorTimeFrameHeadercomponent in a conditional render ensures that it is only displayed when the monitor data has finished loading. - Business value: Improving the user experience and providing clear feedback to the user can lead to increased user satisfaction and engagement with the application.
- Risk assessment: The suggested improvements reduce the risk of user confusion or frustration by providing clear feedback and ensuring that the
MonitorTimeFrameHeadercomponent is only displayed when the monitor data has finished loading.
- Technical benefits: Adding a loading indicator improves the user experience by providing feedback that the application is working. Additionally, wrapping the
-
Client/src/Components/MonitorStatusHeader/index.jsx
- Submitted PR Code:
// ... (previous code)
<ConfigButton
path={path}
shouldRender={isAdmin}
monitorId={monitor?._id}
/>
// ... (remaining code)- Analysis:
- Current logic and potential issues: The PR introduces the
pathprop to theMonitorStatusHeadercomponent, which is used to dynamically generate the configuration path for the monitor. However, the current logic does not validate or sanitize thepathprop, which could lead to security vulnerabilities or unexpected behavior. - Edge cases and error handling: The current implementation does not handle the case where the
pathprop is not provided or is invalid. Additionally, it does not provide any error handling or feedback to the user if the configuration path is invalid or leads to an unexpected page. - **Cross-component impact **: The changes in this file could impact the user experience and navigation flow, as the configuration path is used to redirect the user to the monitor configuration page.
- **Business logic considerations **: The
pathprop should be validated and sanitized to ensure that it is a valid and safe URL. Additionally, the component should provide clear feedback to the user if the configuration path is invalid or leads to an unexpected page.
- Current logic and potential issues: The PR introduces the
- LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements:
const validatePath = (path) => {
if (!path || !/^\/[a-zA-Z0-9_-]+$/.test(path)) {
console.error("Invalid path prop provided to MonitorStatusHeader component");
return null;
}
return path;
};
// ... (remaining code)
<ConfigButton
path={validatePath(path)}
shouldRender={isAdmin}
monitorId={monitor?._id}
/>-
Improvement rationale:
- Technical benefits: Validating and sanitizing the
pathprop improves the security and stability of the application by preventing invalid or malicious input from being used to generate the configuration path. - Business value: Improving the security and stability of the application can lead to increased user trust and engagement with the application.
- Risk assessment: The suggested improvements reduce the risk of security vulnerabilities and unexpected behavior by validating and sanitizing the
pathprop.
- Technical benefits: Validating and sanitizing the
-
Client/src/Components/MonitorTimeFrameHeader/index.jsx
- Submitted PR Code:
// ... (previous code)
<ButtonGroup sx={{ height: 32 }}>
<Button
variant="group"
filled={(dateRange === "day").toString()}
onClick={() => setDateRange("day")}
>
Day
</Button>
<Button
variant="group"
filled={(dateRange === "week").toString()}
onClick={() => setDateRange("week")}
>
Week
</Button>
<Button
variant="group"
filled={(dateRange === "month").toString()}
onClick={() => setDateRange("month")}
>
Month
</Button>
</ButtonGroup>
// ... (remaining code)- Analysis:
- Current logic and potential issues: The PR introduces a
ButtonGroupto theMonitorTimeFrameHeadercomponent, which is used to allow the user to filter the data by time frame. However, the current logic does not provide any visual feedback to the user to indicate which time frame is currently selected. - Edge cases and error handling: The current implementation does not handle the case where the
dateRangeprop is not provided or is invalid. Additionally, it does not provide any error handling or feedback to the user if the selected time frame is invalid or not supported. - **Cross-component impact **: The changes in this file could impact the user experience and layout of the
MonitorTimeFrameHeadercomponent, as theButtonGroupis used to display the available time frames. - **Business logic considerations **: The
ButtonGroupshould provide clear visual feedback to the user to indicate which time frame is currently selected. Additionally, the component should provide clear feedback to the user if the selected time frame is invalid or not supported.
- Current logic and potential issues: The PR introduces a
- LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements:
<ButtonGroup sx={{ height: 32 }}>
<Button
variant="group"
filled={(dateRange === "day").toString()}
onClick={() => setDateRange("day")}
sx={{ backgroundColor: (dateRange === "day") ? "primary.main" : "transparent" }}
>
Day
</Button>
<Button
variant="group"
filled={(dateRange === "week").toString()}
onClick={() => setDateRange("week")}
sx={{ backgroundColor: (dateRange === "week") ? "primary.main" : "transparent" }}
>
Week
</Button>
<Button
variant="group"
filled={(dateRange === "month").toString()}
onClick={() => setDateRange("month")}
sx={{ backgroundColor: (dateRange === "month") ? "primary.main" : "transparent" }}
>
Month
</Button>
</ButtonGroup>- Improvement rationale:
- Technical benefits: Providing visual feedback to the user improves the user experience by making it clear which time frame is currently selected. Additionally, it makes it easier for the user to switch between time frames.
- Business value: Improving the user experience can lead to increased user satisfaction and engagement with the application.
- Risk assessment: The suggested improvements reduce the risk of user confusion or frustration by providing clear visual feedback to the user.
Cross-cutting Concerns
- Data flow analysis: The changes in this PR affect the data flow between several components, including
MonitorStatusHeader,MonitorTimeFrameHeader, and the PageSpeed details page itself. It is important to ensure that the data flow is consistent and correct across all components. - State management implications: The introduction of the
MonitorTimeFrameHeadercomponent could have implications for state management, as the selected time frame is likely to be stored in the component's state. It is important to ensure that the state is managed correctly and consistently across all components that use theMonitorTimeFrameHeadercomponent. - Error propagation paths: The changes in this PR could introduce new error propagation paths, especially around component rendering and routing. It is important to ensure that errors are handled correctly and consistently across all components.
- Edge case handling across components: The changes in this PR could introduce new edge cases, especially around component rendering and routing. It is important to ensure that edge cases are handled correctly and consistently across all components.
Algorithm & Data Structure Analysis
- Complexity analysis: The changes in this PR do not introduce any new algorithms or data structures. However, it is important to ensure that the existing algorithms and data structures are used efficiently and correctly.
- Performance implications: The changes in this PR could have performance implications, especially around component rendering and routing. It is important to ensure that the application remains performant and responsive under various loads and scenarios.
- Memory usage considerations: The changes in this PR could have memory usage implications, especially around component rendering and state management. It is important to ensure that the application uses memory efficiently and does not leak memory over time.
2.2 Implementation Quality
- Code organization and structure: The code in this PR is well-organized and follows a consistent structure. However, there are some areas where the code could be refactored or improved to follow best practices.
- Design patterns usage: The code in this PR uses several design patterns, such as the observer pattern for monitoring changes in the monitor status. However, there are some areas where the code could be refactored or improved to follow best practices.
- Error handling approach: The code in this PR uses a combination of try-catch blocks and error boundaries to handle errors. However, there are some areas where the error handling could be improved or refactored to follow best practices.
- Resource management: The code in this PR does not appear to have any significant resource management issues. However, it is important to ensure that the application manages resources efficiently and does not leak resources over time.
3. Critical Findings
3.1 Potential Issues
- 🔴 Critical Issues
- Issue description: The current implementation of the empty view for the PageSpeed details page does not handle the case where the monitor is still loading. This could lead to a poor user experience, as the user will see a blank screen instead of a loading indicator.
- Impact: This issue could lead to user confusion or frustration, as the user will not know whether the monitor is still loading or if there is an error.
- Recommendation: Add a loading indicator to the empty view for the PageSpeed details page, and display it while the monitor data is being fetched. Additionally, provide a way for the user to refresh or retry the monitor if it fails to load initially.
- 🟡 Warnings
- Warning description: The current implementation of the
MonitorTimeFrameHeadercomponent does not handle the case where the monitor is still loading. This could lead to a poor user experience, as the user will see a blank space instead of a loading indicator. - Potential risks: This issue could lead to user confusion or frustration, as the user will not know whether the monitor is still loading or if there is an error.
- Suggested improvements: Add a loading indicator to the
MonitorTimeFrameHeadercomponent, and display it while the monitor data is being fetched. Additionally, wrap theMonitorTimeFrameHeadercomponent in a conditional render to ensure that it is only displayed when the monitor data has finished loading.
- Warning description: The current implementation of the
- Critical Issues
- Issue description: The current implementation of the
MonitorStatusHeadercomponent does not validate or sanitize thepathprop, which could lead to security vulnerabilities or unexpected behavior. - Impact: This issue could lead to security vulnerabilities, as an attacker could potentially provide a malicious or invalid
pathprop to generate an unexpected or malicious configuration path. - Recommendation: Add validation and sanitization logic to the
pathprop in theMonitorStatusHeadercomponent. Additionally, provide clear feedback to the user if the configuration path is invalid or leads to an unexpected page.
- Issue description: The current implementation of the
- Critical Issues
- Issue description: The current implementation of the
MonitorTimeFrameHeadercomponent does not provide any visual feedback to the user to indicate which time frame is currently selected. - Impact: This issue could lead to user confusion or frustration, as the user will not know which time frame is currently selected.
- Recommendation: Add visual feedback to the
MonitorTimeFrameHeadercomponent to indicate which time frame is currently selected. Additionally, provide clear feedback to the user if the selected time frame is invalid or not supported.
- Issue description: The current implementation of the
3.2 Code Quality Concerns
- Maintainability aspects: The code in this PR is generally well-maintained and follows best practices. However, there are some areas where the code could be refactored or improved to follow best practices.
- Readability issues: The code in this PR is generally well-documented and follows best practices. However, there are some areas where the documentation could be improved or refactored to follow best practices.
- Performance bottlenecks: The code in this PR does not appear to have any significant performance bottlenecks. However, it is important to ensure that the application remains performant and responsive under various loads and scenarios.
4. Security Assessment
- Authentication/Authorization impacts: The changes in this PR do not appear to have any significant authentication or authorization impacts. However, it is important to ensure that the application remains secure and that user data is protected.
- Data handling concerns: The changes in this PR do not appear to have any significant data handling concerns. However, it is important to ensure that user data is handled securely and that the application remains compliant with relevant data protection regulations.
- Input validation: The changes in this PR do not appear to have any significant input validation concerns. However, it is important to ensure that user input is validated and sanitized to prevent malicious or unexpected behavior.
- Security best practices: The code in this PR follows several security best practices, such as using HTTPS for all communication and validating user input. However, it is important to ensure that the application remains secure and that user data is protected.
- Potential security risks: The changes in this PR do not appear to introduce any new potential security risks. However, it is important to ensure that the application remains secure and that user data is protected.
- Mitigation strategies: The changes in this PR do not appear to require any new mitigation strategies. However, it is important to ensure that the application remains secure and that user data is protected.
- Security testing requirements: The changes in this PR do not appear to require any new security testing requirements. However, it is important to ensure that the application remains secure and that user data is protected.
5. Testing Strategy
5.1 Test Coverage
- Unit test analysis: The changes in this PR do not appear to require any new unit tests. However, it is important to ensure that the existing unit tests cover the changes in this PR and that the application remains thoroughly tested.
- Integration test requirements: The changes in this PR could introduce new integration test requirements, especially around component rendering and routing. It is important to ensure that the application remains thoroughly tested and that all components work together correctly.
- Edge cases coverage: The changes in this PR could introduce new edge cases, especially around component rendering and routing. It is important to ensure that the application remains thoroughly tested and that all edge cases are handled correctly.
5.2 Test Recommendations
Suggested Test Cases
// Example test case for the PageSpeed details page empty view
it("should display the empty view when no checks exist and the monitor is not loading", () => {
const { getByText } = render(<PageSpeedDetails />);
// ... (arrange the component state to simulate no checks existing)
// ... (assert that the empty view is displayed)
});
// Example test case for the MonitorTimeFrameHeader component loading indicator
it("should display the loading indicator when the monitor is still loading", () => {
const { getByTestId } = render(<MonitorTimeFrameHeader />);
// ... (arrange the component state to simulate the monitor still loading)
// ... (assert that the loading indicator is displayed)
});- Coverage improvements: It is important to ensure that the application remains thoroughly tested and that all components work together correctly. Additionally, it is important to ensure that the test coverage is comprehensive and that all relevant scenarios are covered.
- Performance testing needs: The changes in this PR could have performance implications, especially around component rendering and routing. It is important to ensure that the application remains performant and responsive under various loads and scenarios.
6. Documentation & Maintenance
- Documentation updates needed: The changes in this PR do not appear to require any new documentation updates. However, it is important to ensure that the existing documentation is up-to-date and that the application remains well-documented.
- Long-term maintenance considerations: The changes in this PR could introduce new long-term maintenance considerations, especially around component rendering and routing. It is important to ensure that the application remains maintainable and that any new components or features are well-documented and easy to maintain.
- Technical debt and monitoring requirements: The changes in this PR do not appear to introduce any new technical debt or monitoring requirements. However, it is important to ensure that the application remains free of technical debt and that any new components or features are well-tested and well-documented.
7. Deployment & Operations
- Deployment impact and strategy: The changes in this PR do not appear to have any significant deployment impacts. However, it is important to ensure that the application can be deployed smoothly and that any new components or features are well-tested and well-documented.
- Key operational considerations: The changes in this PR do not appear to have any significant operational considerations. However, it is important to ensure that the application remains stable and that any new components or features are well-tested and well-documented.
8. Summary & Recommendations
8.1 Key Action Items
- Add a loading indicator to the empty view for the PageSpeed details page, and display it while the monitor data is being fetched. Additionally, provide a way for the user to refresh or retry the monitor if it fails to load initially.
- Add a loading indicator to the MonitorTimeFrameHeader component, and display it while the monitor data is being fetched. Additionally, wrap the MonitorTimeFrameHeader component in a conditional render to ensure that it is only displayed when the monitor data has finished loading.
- Add validation and sanitization logic to the path prop in the MonitorStatusHeader component. Additionally, provide clear feedback to the user if the configuration path is invalid or leads to an unexpected page.
- Add visual feedback to the MonitorTimeFrameHeader component to indicate which time frame is currently selected. Additionally, provide clear feedback to the user if the selected time frame is invalid or not supported.
- Update unit tests to reflect the changes in reusable components and ensure that they continue to function as expected.
- Update integration tests to reflect the changes in component rendering and routing, and ensure that all components work together correctly.
- Update edge case tests to reflect the changes in component rendering and routing, and ensure that all edge cases are handled correctly.
8.2 Future Considerations
- Technical evolution path: The changes in this PR lay the groundwork for future enhancements and improvements to the application. It is important to ensure that the application remains flexible and that new features can be easily added or modified.
- Business capability evolution: The changes in this PR improve the user experience and provide new functionality to the application. It is important to ensure that the application remains flexible and that new business capabilities can be easily added or modified.
- System integration impacts: The changes in this PR could have implications for system integration, especially around component rendering and routing. It is important to ensure that the application remains stable and that any new components or features are well-tested and well-documented.
💡 Help Shape LlamaPReview
How's this review format working for you? Vote in our Github Discussion Polls to help us improve your review experience!
This was referenced Jan 31, 2025
9 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR adds an empty view to the PageSpeed details view if no checks exists. It also fixes some minor bugs