-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix Erroneous "No BuildArchitecture specified in Layer" Warning #6508
Merged
Merged
Changes from 3 commits
Commits
Show all changes
12 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
c9d5c67
Move Missing BuildArchitecture warning to build_layer
d181877
Formatting
e302c4f
Fix typo
457edf0
Narrow warnings to mismatches between buildArch and Compatible Archit…
bc59f9d
Fix some tests
9d3e38b
Fix integ test
c8afda2
More integ tests
1eef3e6
Format fix
0720024
Fix integ test
e43f5f6
Fix typo
1029dcb
Merge branch 'develop' into bentvels-fix-6444
bentvelj 812adb4
Parameterize test with use_container
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we want to print this warning message if layer has
arm64
architecture asCompatibleArchitectures
but it doesn't haveBuildArchitecture
propertyThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There is another warning in the LayerVersion constructor that should take care of this.
It would output
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This may be slightly confusing if the customer doesn't know that x86 is the default? Maybe we can adjust the messaging here
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
My concern with this one is; if I have a layer which is supposed to be built with
x86
I will keep getting these warning messages all the time, which can be annoying.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Right. As discussed, going to restructure according to these rules:
There are two cases where we'd like to warn the customer