Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: Revert 'Make pylintrc ignore rule more readable' #2375 #2400

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Nov 23, 2020

Conversation

aahung
Copy link
Contributor

@aahung aahung commented Nov 20, 2020

Which issue(s) does this change fix?

revert #2375 to make merges smoother.

Why is this change necessary?

How does it address the issue?

What side effects does this change have?

Checklist

  • Write design document (Do I need to write a design document?)
  • Write unit tests
  • Write/update functional tests
  • Write/update integration tests
  • make pr passes
  • make update-reproducible-reqs if dependencies were changed
  • Write documentation

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

@aahung aahung requested a review from sriram-mv November 20, 2020 08:39
@aahung aahung changed the title chore: Revert "chore: Make pylintrc ignore rule more readable" #2375, bring back in the future chore: Revert "chore: Make pylintrc ignore rule more readable" #2375 Nov 20, 2020
@aahung aahung changed the title chore: Revert "chore: Make pylintrc ignore rule more readable" #2375 chore: Revert "Make pylintrc ignore rule more readable" #2375 Nov 20, 2020
@aahung aahung changed the title chore: Revert "Make pylintrc ignore rule more readable" #2375 chore: Revert Make pylintrc ignore rule more readable #2375 Nov 20, 2020
@hoffa hoffa changed the title chore: Revert Make pylintrc ignore rule more readable #2375 chore: Revert 'Make pylintrc ignore rule more readable' #2375 Nov 20, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants