ORC-1542: Use Java 16 Pattern Matching for instanceof (JEP-394)
#1681
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
cxzl25
pushed a commit
to cxzl25/orc
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 11, 2024
### What changes were proposed in this pull request? This PR aims to use Java 16 `Pattern Matching for instanceof` (JEP-394) syntax. ### Why are the changes needed? Since Apache ORC 2.0 supports Java 17+, we can take advantage of this new syntax. ### How was this patch tested? Pass the CIs. Closes apache#1681 from dongjoon-hyun/ORC-1542. Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <[email protected]>
This was referenced Apr 10, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR aims to use Java 16
Pattern Matching for instanceof(JEP-394) syntax.Why are the changes needed?
Since Apache ORC 2.0 supports Java 17+, we can take advantage of this new syntax.
How was this patch tested?
Pass the CIs.